concerned, they believed hill clinton should go to jail. if i win, i am going to instruct my attorney general to get aat special prosecutor to lk into your situation. you know, it is just awfully good that someone with the temperament of donald trump is not in charge of the law in our country.r because you d be in jail. should hillary clinton be in jail? yes no. you know her. if i did what she did, i d be in jail. if i did a tenth of what she did, i d be in jail today. remember the crowds at the republican national convention just thundering over and over again, lock her up! what they were actually saying was lock her up for mishandling classified information. once donald trump did become president, he did try to put her in jail. on multiple occasions he told officials toe prosecute clinto. he ordered his white house counsel to get a justice department to prosecute her. according to a book from beater baker, trump repeatedly pressured his attorneys general to pr
for that aviation company appears to have gone dark last friday. that is important. that was right around the time it first game public that vertol systems was the company that got paid by the state of florida to run governor ron desantis stunt of flying migrants from texas to martha s vineyard. governor desantis admission is refusing to release the details of a $12 million contract entered into with vertol systems. the daily beast reports that they pawed them more than double the market price to fly migrants from san antonio to martha s vineyard last week. why is this mysterious little flight company getting so much money from florida taxpayers? probably has something to do with the fact that vertol systems has numerous times to republican politicians in the state of florida. vertol systems former lawyer, larry keefe, is now in charge of
block him. the new york times report says he said to them, if you get a court order to block me, then they wouldn t testify. then there is this tanned liesing end to the new york times story. his testimony has been delayed. i think that s the most likely that we re in the realm of speculation. how do you like the privilege claims on this? i think it s pretty clear that they d be dead in the water in the d.c. circuit. there is a d.c. circuit court of appeals decision that is so squarely on point and it says can you not assert executive privilege when you have a grand jury calling for your testimony. in fact, in that case, it was an incumbent deputy white house counsel. more so there would have been interests on the side of executive privilege for the incumbent white house counsel. here we have a former white house lawyer and the incumbent president has waived executive privilege for the january 6 inquiry. of so it s really remarkable. it s almost like they re setting themselves
czar. his portfolio, as you mention, is over immigration. he was the lawyer for this company. we would like to know, did he recommend this company? and what was his relationship with this company when under discussion? again, no answers. there are a number of republican ties to this plot that make you think it s just slightly political. mark caputo, national reporter for nbc news digital, thank you for your reporting. thank you. coming up, three high powered attorneys, you can see them right here, they emerged from a d.c. federal courthouse today. they all represent former donald trump. so why were they there? but next, u.s. ambassador to the u.n. linda thomas greenfield joins me in studio to discuss historic protests for women s rights and much more. s for wome rights and much more