is saying today, not a bad idea, it can still be a pop up if they do not get what they want to post side of summer recess. judge napolitano: so if harris is right and they want all of us to talk about this, they have absolutely succeeded. because we are not the only one that it is talking about it. lisa: can i make one more point? you had moderate republicans try to move forward with the discharge petition, they were appraised in the media, nobody was talking about the fact that they were trying to usurp regular order or trying to go move something forward without committee or leadership. harris: i want to hear what democrats have to say, leslie. leslie: you know, i agree with you on this. we are on the same side. because the constitution to our nation is like the bible is to religion, christianity. when he reread section four, article two to your point when you re talking about high crimes and misdemeanors, you re putting it in a sentence even though you not specifying with tr
dagen: that is what is behind here, talking to andy bigs about this, and the decision-making process is the frustration with the doj, the fbi, slow rolling the process, you look at text messages that popped up and to the reports that were never given to congress, you look at the doj claiming that things are of national interest, and finding out that they aren t. so congress is incredibly frustrated. and what other options are on the table for republicans in the house or in congress to try to obtain? harris: just they are with the one thing, because this is what some critics inside the republican party are saying. if you were really serious about this, you would have actually pulled the trigger earlier this week or even last week, not on the eve of the summer recess, but the politics of this are difficult i would say for the freedom caucus, because they squawked a lot, hang on, lisa, they squawked a lot about rule of order. this was not per the protocol. did he go back and get that
with bribery. this does not fit the high crimes of misdemeanors, one, they have 11 people, the majority of the house, two-thirds of the senate that is going nowhere. harris: what i am reading, leslie, if they can get back to the rule of order, if they can do the things that today need to do, they will get more than those 11 people. in fact with the leadership leslie: nobody has been removed from their job based on impeachment. and i look at it very simplistically, why have republicans muttering the word, uttering the word impeachment, impeachment, when that is a democratic talking point when it comes to president trump? harris: lisa, i think that i can make your head pop with the breaking news. because we have been talking about house leadership. here it is. representative jim jordan, per the reporting, our producer on
assessments had to be made in 2017. is it just too late? i would suggest it must be irs changes the rule, and to go back into 2017, i would suggest a bunch of states have come in and try to usurp it, but i don t think that is going to work unless the irs decides to make nice with something like this. there is nothing like confucian. arthel: what does that mean? what could they do? to come in chemistry to the irs and come out with a law that predates 2018 and 22017. the law as it stands right now unless the property has assessed the taxes in the year 2017, you cannot pre-pay, meaning you were going to lose people that pay $30,000 in property taxes.
states of america. i think that the president has understood and been forced to understand the limits of his power in many respects, which is a beautiful thing, in terms of the executive understanding the limits of his power. and i would also argue his predecessor was expanding his power and going outside his authority of the executive branch. that was very troubling too. so i think it s a bipartisan problem, when you have someone in the executive trying to usurp power from whoever, whether it s the judiciary or the legislature. so i think it s a problem that is it happens often. and it s up to us, it s really up to us, the people, to make sure that we call it out. is this a both sides thing? did president obama ever encourage the doj to go after that s a bigger issue here, the independence of the department of justice, which i think republicans and democrats ought to be concerned about. this is nixonian. neither republicans nor