about this going all the way at least until just after the election. listen to what she told us a short time ago. the president has lost, like i said, his lost confidence in director comey and frankly he s been considering letting electrical mcgough since the day he was elected. but he did have a conversation with the deputy attorney general on monday where they had come to him to express their concern. the president asked they put their concerns and recommendation in writing. they went through the appropriate procedure. deputy attorney general gave a long letter to the attorney general, jeff sessions, saying he think he had tried to usurp loretta lynch s authority when he held the press conference on july 5. the attorney general sent that recommendation to the president who wrote the now famous letter of termination. eric, what we are learning today
no control. this is usurp of impatient power. the end result is the whole world and media will soon see we begin to take further actions the power of the president to protect our country are very substantial and not be questioned. the bottom line the president s powers in this area represent the apex of executive authority. we will have unquestioned military strength beyond anything anybody can imagine. we have have a president who has done more in three weeks than most presidents have done in an entire administration. we stand with our ally and two men on camera to all of planet earth was a statement that will be understood very well by north korea. i m not going to make a comment on that. i don t have any information on it. i do want to shay that sean spicer as always is 100% correct and what he said is true and important and i agree with it. so then you are making a comment on it? i m not going to make any new comment. it is a fact, and you will not deny it, that there are massi
country has done something so disastrous to the relationship not only with israel, but the stability of one of the most troubled regions in the world. so yes, i applaud donald trump for speaking out. and this sends a signal about the change that will take place when he s our president. what do you think, doug? because there s been some criticism that it really is a standoff there that he s stepping on president obama s toes. well, normally i would want to and tend to agree. there s a big but. this upsets settled american policy. eight years of, you know, steadfast veto and blocking these type of resolutions, to do this, as brad said, right before christmas and hanukkah is an outrage. and with the president also having put a ban on offshore drilling, it looks to me like president obama is effectively trying to usurp donald trump s
is we are going to have this right after you he doesn t care is he going ahead and implementing federal policy even though the judge held it up. is he insulting the federal judge number one. number two it is absolute amnesty that these people who entered illegally or who were don t have papers to be here, are going to have every right that americans have. it is amnesty. will the judges in your opinion take that into consideration? his finding was that this violated the administrative procedures act because the president didn t lay these rules out for comment and so forth. raises constitutional questions about the separation of powers. did the president in essence, usurp the right of the congress of the united states by changing the law on his own? did he have the authority to do this, and the second question, one of federalism that is to say what is the impact on the states and
is we are going to have this right after you he doesn t care is he going ahead and implementing federal policy even though the judge held it up. is he insulting the federal judge number one. number two it is absolute amnesty that these people who entered illegally or who were don t have papers to be here, are going to have every right that americans have. it is amnesty. will the judges in your opinion take that into consideration? his finding was that this violated the administrative procedures act because the president didn t lay these rules out for comment and so forth. raises constitutional questions about the separation of powers. did the president in essence, usurp the right of the congress of the united states by changing the law on his own? did he have the authority to do this, and the second question, one of federalism that is to say what is the impact on the states and