keeping, the latest in a string of things that is probably going to keep happening? this is not an isolated incident. i believe that this is an example of after incident that will continue to happen. and you know, even though some of these groups have dips avowed what has happened up in oregon this time, you can t unring a bell. they ve supported cliven bundy and some of these other incidents throughout the west. so i think it s not an isolated incident. your group has put out a report this past year, in august, called going to extremes, the anti-government extremism behind the growing movement to seize america s public lands. and public land use is the sort of thing that feels esoteric except concerns about that seem to be what s driving the armed very provocative standoffs. map s the connection between
groups seem to have some infighting around it, or is this in keeping? is this the latest in a string of these things that are probably going to keep happening? look, this is not an isolated incident. i believe that this is an example of an incident that will continue to happen. and you know, even though some of these groups have disavowed what has happened up in oregon this time, you can t unring a bell. they ve supported cliven bundy and some of these other incidents throughout the west. so i think it s not an isolated incident. your group has put out a report this past year, in august, called going to extremes, the anti-government extremism behind the growing movement to seize america s public lands. and public land use is the sort of thing that feels a little bit esoteric except concerns about that seem to be what s driving
one sole purpose. peggy newman this morning writes he has the guts and hunger but does he have the brains to be speaker? i said it yesterday. imagine you re tray and spend a couple of years building the case and investigating looking into it and in one moment the rug is pulled out and it gives hillary clinton and her defenders all the ammunition. it s there forever. as we said in court, you put this qualifying evidence out there. you can t unring a bell. a judge can t unring a bell. this bell has been rung and it will hang around the committee for the rest of its tenure there. i ve seen it in politics. there s nothing they can do to unring this bell and the
judge struck them all and said they d never they never, ever should have been included in these pleadings. but you can t unring a bell. so i need to be vindicated factually, as well. this woman simply made the story up out of cloth. i never met her. i don t know her. i ve never touched her. totally, totally made up. i m pursuing my remedies. i am suing the lawyers and perhaps will be suing her, as well, for defamation. she s been hiding, trying to avoid getting served. we found her hiding in colorado and served her. now she will have to be deposed. if she repeats in a deposition under oath what she has said, she will go to prison because she will have committed perjury which we can then prove beyond a reasonable doubt. we should note the alleged victims claimed you had sex with them while they were underage. that it was part some scheme and ring connected with your friend jeffrey epstein. why do you think this all even
dershowitz told us earlier the judge made the right decision. i feel fully vindicated legally. it s as if the charges had never been brought because the judge struck them all and said they never, ever should have been included in these pleadings. but you know, you can t unring a bell. so i need to be vindicated factually, as well. this woman simply made this story up. i ve never met her, i don t know her. i ve never touched her. totally made up. and we ll have much more of that interview in the next hour of cnn newsroom. in massachusetts, the jury in the aaron hernandez trial resumes its deliberations in just a few hours. the former new england patriot star is accused of murdering odin lloyd. closing arguments wrapped up tuesday after ten weeks of testimony. the prosecution and the defense stressed the defense of evidence and the lack of evidence in this case.