cause for celebration for the vast majority of th americans who agree with the supreme court, who wrote, racialeliminatinge discrimination means eliminating all of it. it cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. an abc ipsosething poll revealt 52% of americans agree with the decision to race based admissions. but sadly, this did not go over well with many democrats. new york congressman jamaal bowman said the court is illegitimate and that they re there to serve white supremacy and white patriarchy . the supreme court is here to serve oligarchs. oligar they re here to serve billionaires. they re here to servchey re her. they re here to serve white supremacy and white patriarchyr and nativism. they want to take away our civil rights. they want to take away our voting rights, our human s rights. , huma they want to make our country more dangerous by expanding concealen men s ri wand carry p they don t
a hue and cry from universities saying that their admissio n of minority students would plummet. and that was interesting because during the oralral argument and for the last 50 years, universitiesgument a e told the supreme court that it s not putting a huge amount of weight on race, that it sacts one of many factors, that it s not a berkeley. situation. and yet once the court got rid of race, you had all these commentators and all these is goingsaying this to, you know, just have our numbers plummet. co and so obviously, race was a far more significant factor. isknow, habut i think that chiee roberts basically laid outice re how they re going to do this. that is he did say that and ilad think correctl outo this.y so tt a student can discuss how he or she overcame discrimination in their lives as part of their essays that will identify those those applicants. bu part of t he did warn univers as well. he warned universities don t applican the advice of sotomayorsoto and ketanji brown,