cause for celebration for the vast majority of th americans who agree with the supreme court, who wrote, racialeliminatinge discrimination means eliminating all of it. it cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. an abc ipsosething poll revealt 52% of americans agree with the decision to race based admissions. but sadly, this did not go over well with many democrats. new york congressman jamaal bowman said the court is illegitimate and that they re there to serve white supremacy and white patriarchy . the supreme court is here to serve oligarchs. oligar they re here to serve billionaires. they re here to servchey re her. they re here to serve white supremacy and white patriarchyr and nativism. they want to take away our civil rights. they want to take away our voting rights, our human s rights. , huma they want to make our country more dangerous by expanding concealen men s ri wand carry p they don t
born. he took ms..he took roberts, the mother, and the, an child d, off of his healthealth insurance not long after she was bornin . e and then after that, he says, wait a minute, i can t afford to pay the child support payments monthly that you re asking for. you know, the guy who will remember, he made millions of dollars in ukraine, in china, for services. we still don t knowdon t kn what those services were exactly. and then he became leonardo da vinci when he never painted before in his life. and he made up to $500,000 pers painting there. so how he can t affordlife. pay child support and that the grandparents and jill biden won t even acknowledge this this child is just rancid.just it s the only word that comes to mind. it s disgracefule only word . it is a true failure of one sof test of character. joe, you mentioned acter. met. you mentioned advisers. i what isurious your explanation for for this disgraceful behavioryour e? why? why deny this child evenchild,
a hue and cry from universities saying that their admissio n of minority students would plummet. and that was interesting because during the oralral argument and for the last 50 years, universitiesgument a e told the supreme court that it s not putting a huge amount of weight on race, that it sacts one of many factors, that it s not a berkeley. situation. and yet once the court got rid of race, you had all these commentators and all these is goingsaying this to, you know, just have our numbers plummet. co and so obviously, race was a far more significant factor. isknow, habut i think that chiee roberts basically laid outice re how they re going to do this. that is he did say that and ilad think correctl outo this.y so tt a student can discuss how he or she overcame discrimination in their lives as part of their essays that will identify those those applicants. bu part of t he did warn univers as well. he warned universities don t applican the advice of sotomayorsoto and ketanji brown,
the name biden well, i think from a political perspective, if you read the new york timesis piece, it is seen as obviously it the bidens don t want to broach because it hurts them politically, because it pierces that whole image that joe biden is the carine thatg on jill biden is the caring one.e,c and obviouslary, they re always about family except when it s inconvenient. right. and look and obviou this piece, by the way. well, bill, well, it falls somewhere between laughablby th and borderline disgusting because it somehow mentions the name trump. times get this, 14 times. well, 14 times in this. i piece and a story about hunter biden a impregnating a woman. and afte w, after r his child il and all the things that happened since and i got thinince, d the name trump 14 times and the whole implication was actu, oh, at13 t one point donad trump jr actually went hunting with the lawyer for miss roberts. so therefore somehow the trumps have their hands in all of this. huntthe lawytsis