And Everyone Wants to know how long social distancing will last but the real question may be how many times will we have to do this. Hello the World Health Organization has sounded a note of hope for the european nations worst hit by the corona virus pandemic saying steps taken in italy and spain should see case numbers drop soon despite the number of infections in spain has posture in the past 24 hours while it saw 800 new deaths and in italy the number of new cases continued to fall but deaths past the 11000 mark and the u. S. Is bracing for the outbreak there to get worse a hospital ship with a 1000 beds has now docked in new york while the top Infectious Disease expert says there will be clusters in other big cities and a 3 week lockdown has begun in zimbabwe with police and forcing some of the toughest measure seen in africa shops have been shut and Movement Restricted the countrys seen one death so far so with many countries in europe and lockdown the fight can take continues to
The meeting will come to order, elections to order, i will ask unanimous consent, members of noncommittee be able to sit with subcommittee at todays hearing and ask questions, without objection, so ordered. Good morning and i want to thank todays witnesses for joining the subcommittee ongoing discussion on the status of boeing of 737 max, second and series investigating tragic boeing 737 max accidents, the purpose of todays hearing is to hear from people who fly the airplanes and those who fly in the airplanes. Their loved ones deserve answer. Congress and the industry has worked together to restore confidence and air travel, the foundation of the Community Investigation into boeing 737 max is ensuring safety, as i said before, if the public does not feel safe about flying, then they wont fly, they dont fly, the airlines dont need to buy airplanes, they dont need to buy airplanes, airplanes dont need to be built and if theres no need to build airplanes, no job in aviation, the foundati
First of all, lets not make too much of this. A majority of the people who vote yesterday were female. It was 5149. But it was less than we a point or so less, but it wasnt like there was a huge shift in the gender balance in the electorate that voted yesterday. Women have a tendency to place a higher priority on issues like education and health care and i think any politicians, republican or democrat who hopes to appeal to women has got to have something intelligent to say about both of those issues. We dont have as many people as we need to be able to articulate a position on education. Its not coincidence that the last republican president was very, very good and talked a lot about education. Lamar alexander talks a lot about education. We dont have as many as we need to paint a compelling picture. Good point. By the way, i would say the last two republican president s good point. George bush senior we may disagree with their policies but they articulated strongly on education. And
Rights in egypt . Again, i agree that it is not a coincidence. An opportunity in january of 2011 to have a discontinuation, to have a cut off point to say this was the have transparent and Accountable Government and lets at least the senior level of administration to see who needs to be transferred to maria trained and prosecuted or at least relieved from duty. Byre was at least an attempt the very first cabinet that came, that was appointed after mubaraks ouster, there was an attempt to have laws that would not have criminalized, not have ushered in prosecutions for past corruption, what did that socked , torevent future corruption really address the root causes of corruption like conflict of interest laws, more transparent and publicly accessible budget making postings and final outcome. The military council that was in power that came after mubarak had a vested interest in. Aintaining the mubarak state that is why we did not see a coherent prosecution strategy for past corruption an
About that is that what is portrayed sometimes as being seeticized, what you really is the operation of different judicial philosophies at work. These are legitimate philosophies. They tend to drive them in a principled way towards answers to the same question. If you are able to perceive that a lot of times that is not the right way to aink about it erie it this is wellthoughtout philosophy about the law and the constitution, but they just dont have the same philosophy. This generates different results. You could say the same thing about the great battles in the Supreme Court over the new deal. There were philosophies about how you did interpret the constitution in certain areas. This generates some sharp differences. Times, the court was not just political in this sort of cents, how they align with political ideology, but they were actual politicians. Had one justice run for president and another former president , chief justice taft, appointed to the court. The first the first chief