bait and switch, i pulled this from their confirmation hearings about what they had to say about roe. i would tell you that roe versus wade decided in 1973, the united states supreme court, it has been reaffirmed so a good judge will consider it as precedent of the united states supreme court worthy of treatment as precedent. as a judge, it is an important precedent of the supreme court, casey is precedent on precedent. roe is not a super precedent because calls for its overruling have never ceased but that doesn t mean that roe should be overruled. it just means that it doesn t fall on the small handful of cases like brown versus the board. in every case in which there s a prior precedent, the