bait and switch, i pulled this from their confirmation hearings about what they had to say about roe. >> i would tell you that roe versus wade decided in 1973, the united states supreme court, it has been reaffirmed so a good judge will consider it as precedent of the united states supreme court worthy of treatment as precedent. >> as a judge, it is an important precedent of the supreme court, casey is precedent on precedent. >> roe is not a super precedent because calls for its overruling have never ceased but that doesn't mean that roe should be overruled. it just means that it doesn't fall on the small handful of cases like brown versus the board. >> in every case in which there's a prior precedent, the