Way to move the ball forward. Other members of the panel i dont know if anyone would like to comment on the clarity of the language. I would say while we recognize the preventy of it to simply say, go act reasonably, thats a negligent standard. Were all under a duty to act reasonably in our daily lives and not be negligent. When youre facing a threat of this nature, to have the congress say, hey, act reasonably, i think thats underwhemg as a standard and expectation as we enter the age of cyber battles. I would agree, particularly when youve got a road map thats worked for 16 years in another industry that you can lean on. Id like to talk a little bit about how unreasonable delay works in the real world. Theres talk about whether a notice should be immediate could you put some specific time frame on when a reasonable notice would occur. Could anyone on the Panel Comment on whether its realistic to require a company to notify consumers within a specific set of days . I think the challen
Yes, sir. What im trying to say is its a challenge in a sense that that in the way the budget is structured. Uh just talked in my opening remarks. These are undergoing operational assessment right now. Our two organizations sat down, and tried to put in the budget on my side ready for acquisition in that time frame and delivered in that time. And the cost is the acquisition and maintenance of that. I frankly doubt that the budget that he put in will get get approved. Its the way the structure, the budget is structured. Being an operational department, cbp have many urgent needs. And if otaa come up and ask for budget for a possible technology that may or may not be successful three years from now, it doesnt come as a very strong argument against other very urgent needs. So the problem of what we call wedging the budget, if we dont do that, then, of course, theres no smooth transition. To deliver a technology in fy 18, if by that time we pass all the assessment, and lets say obp asks, m
I am resurrection and i am white said the lord. Whoever has faith in me shall have lies, and everyone who has lies and has committed himself to me and she shall not die forever. As for me, i know that my redeemer lives and that at the last he will send upon the earth after my awakening, he will raise me up and in my body, i shall see god. I myself shall see in my eyes behold him who is my friend and not a stranger. For none of us have wife and hands of a none terms his own master when we die. For if we have life, we are alive in the lord and if we die, we die in the lord. So then, whether we live or die, we are the worse possession. Happy from now on are those who died in the lord, so it is said we spirit, for they rest from their labor. As dean of Washington National cathedral on behalf of the bishop of washington, i will commit to the service celebrating the remarkable life of senator Daniel Inouye. Washington National Cathedral serves the nation as a Gathering Place of time, in time
Nhs. We must ask ourself today do we want to become a catastrophic hind drains upon our employers. Destruct our teachers and obstruct our health service. No, no, no. The opposition arguement is like discredit our effort claiming its not enough campaign merely deserve the focus of divide region. Over the past year, we have seen great progress [inaudible] leading the way. But just as the u. K. Deficit is not balanced with the government public transport issue are not solved in one year. Were public transport continued a national priority. We cant [inaudible] for the like of my young cousin. We can deliver more transport to get students from point a to point b. We can build a better, Brighter Future for young people. So when the opposition argument say its not a National Campaign, a focus of the divided region. I tell you this, divided we are weak, but united are the nation we are strong. More nation, one notion, one campaign. Better public transport. [applause] [applause] thank you very
The former editoratlarge at canadas mclain magazine talks about the gender gap between women and the risk of drinking. This program is about an hour. Host hi ann. How are you . Guest its so nice to be here. Host i am excited to talk to about this new book called drink very intriguing and very provocative and like i said it are minded me up when i was working in treatment, about the relationship with alcohol and women and i guess one of the questions i wanted to ask you right off is why is the subject seen as a crisis thats important for you to get the message out . Guest we are seeing a global problem, a closing of the gender gap between men and women. Traditionally we have always known that men drink more than women do but whats been happening recently is men have been declining a been declining a little bit in risky drinking and women are not at all. This is global. The more developed the country the richer the country the smaller the gap between men and womens consumption. Places li