spirit, that rebellious spirit she talked about? she had never give up attitude and she had so many different treatments and she was treated under team and, you know, she had so many different chemotherapy treatments. she had radiotherapy treatments including techniques like the cyber night, focal treatment, she had radio frequency ablation treatments of areas in her liver. she literally had every treatment that was possible and she did remarkably well for a long time but unfortunately, as she said, her body was too tired, eventually, and she obviously made the decision there is no further treatment and she wanted to die at home with herfamily. it treatment and she wanted to die at home with her family. treatment and she wanted to die at home with her family. it must be so difficult for home with her family. it must be so difficult for you home with her family. it must be so difficult for you and home with her family. it must be so difficult for you and your home with her fami
amendment giving a fetus and mother equal right to life under irish law. it came in at an unconscionable cost, the lives of irish women. notably dr. savita a 31-year-old denied treatment during a miscarriage in 2012. she died of severe sepsis days later. the united nations human rights council had criticized ireland s law as cruel and inhumane in a case of a woman demade it treatment and forced to go to england for care. ireland, mostly catholic ireland, ultimately decided that the rights and lives of women mattered, and it s a cautionary tale here in the united states as we re now barreling towards codifying that they don t matter. so when justice samuel alito writes, quote, we do not pretend to know how our political system or society will react to the overruling, we do know. it s a hypothetical. ireland showed us what it looks like when religious doctrine becomes law and there s a
treatment of people. what exert some power over china and its treatment of people. treatment of people. what is the reaction from treatment of people. what is the reaction from beijing? treatment of people. what is the reaction from beijing? it - treatment of people. what is the reaction from beijing? it has - treatment of people. what is the | reaction from beijing? it has said reaction from bei ing? it has said in a statement reaction from beijing? it has said in a statement that reaction from beijing? it has said in a statement that they - reaction from beijing? it has said in a statement that they want - reaction from beijing? it has said in a statement that they want to | in a statement that they want to cooperate more with the us when it comes to trade but if you look at individual corporations, they are being caught up in this. a chip manufacturer, intel, they put out a statement this week saying none of their suppliers are going to be able to use anything from that reg
be the largest ever single investment in drug treatment, what do you think of that bearing in mind the conservatives have cut expenditure on access to drug treatment by nearly a fifth in the last ten years? it treatment by nearly a fifth in the last ten years? last ten years? it will be interesting last ten years? it will be interesting to last ten years? it will be interesting to see if - last ten years? it will be interesting to see if thatj last ten years? it will be - interesting to see if that happens. i know the overdose right over the last ten years in a substantial lead to people that are no longer with us since the cutback happened, and the strategy i am saying they are going to put more community workers in. they have done this. they have done drug rehabilitation, iwas they have done this. they have done drug rehabilitation, i was on one of the first pilots, testing, they don t work. people need to go into detoxes, to specialist treatment, providers, where they can get t
errors into the virus s genetic code, blocking the virus from replicating. tt code, blocking the virus from replicating- code, blocking the virus from re-rlicatin. , , replicating. it corrupts the gene name of the replicating. it corrupts the gene name of the virus replicating. it corrupts the gene name of the virus so replicating. it corrupts the gene name of the virus so that - replicating. it corrupts the gene name of the virus so that it - replicating. it corrupts the gene i name of the virus so that it cannot replicate that is the beauty. and then even if the virus mutates it could still be useful. people are now talking about this that if we have another coronavirus pandemic in the future this drug will still work for that coronavirus because it is agnostic to variance. t0 for that coronavirus because it is agnostic to variance. agnostic to variance. to our existin: agnostic to variance. to our existing clinic agnostic to variance. to our existing clinic -based - agnost