redundancy? 0r pays back dismissal, is it a redundancy? or is it some form of business for your organisation? but in either case fairly well clearly defined lines which an employer should seek to stay within to have some chance of defending claims of unfair dismissal. unfair dismissal. finally and i am not sure how unfair dismissal. finally and i am not sure how much unfair dismissal. finally and i am not sure how much detail- unfair dismissal. finally and i am not sure how much detail you - unfair dismissal. finally and i am | not sure how much detail you can unfair dismissal. finally and i am . not sure how much detail you can go into on this, how did the rights of workers, the legal rights of workers here in the uk compared to other countries? especially in europe in the eu. i5 countries? especially in europe in the eu. , ., ., countries? especially in europe in theeu. i, , i, the eu. is a general principle in the eu. is a general principle in the uk, the eu. is a general princ
is it not the same employees, necessarily, but there are other employees and it appears from the announcement that i saw circulating on social media, that they are to be engaged and employed by the third party company provider and that they will provide the staffs of actually, there are other issues in relation to other areas of employment. in the instances where agency workers are being brought in, if they are being asked to inform the same role that other individuals have been sacked from, do those individuals then have a claim for unfair dismissal? if we are talking about the individuals that have been dismissed, they will almost certainly have a claim for unfair dismissal in the context of how the process has been handled. almost certainly. in the context, then, of what is the reason for the employee pays back dismissal, is it a
dismissal case? i think this is unfair dismissal but the thing that workers need to focus on is, what is the package being offered to them? under uk law, where there are breaches of this kind, failure to consult, they can be compensated by payments notice payments, redundancy payments, and a protective award that effectively buys at the fact that they weren t consulted with. if they are being offered something over and above the bare minimum they would need to think carefully about accepting that offer because if they take their cases to tribunal it is highly unlikely they would be reinstated. really interesting, thank you so much for your time. in the united states, amazon has completed its purchase of mgm
0ne worker described how he was removed from a vessel. it s terrible the way i got dealt with. - i was escorted personally. from the bridge of the ship to my cabin. this is my home, i work and live on that ship, i it s my home and i did point this out to the bailiff, - this is my house, i this is where i live. the company s been accused of acting ruthlessly, but the question being asked today is whether it acted legally. you can t simply replace employees with other, cheaper labour. the existing employees have rights. technically they should transfer to the new provider, and again that s something p&0 and the new provider should have consulted with. if the employees were dismissed simply to allow p&0 to bring in this cheaper labour, it may well be that they have claims for automatic unfair dismissal. today, the transport secretaryjoined those condemning p&0 s actions. so, now, i want to take the opportunity to put on record my shock and my dismay at the insensitive and brutal treatment
provider should have consulted with. if the employees were dismissed simply to allow p&0 to bring in this cheaper labour, it may well be that they have claims for automatic unfair dismissal. unfair dismissal. today the transport unfair dismissal. today the transport secretary - unfair dismissal. today the transport secretary joins . unfair dismissal. today the - transport secretary joins those condemning p&0 s actions. 50 transport secretary joins those condemning p&o s actions. so nowl want to take condemning p&o s actions. so nowl want to take the condemning p&o s actions. so nowl want to take the opportunity - condemning p&o s actions. so nowl want to take the opportunity to - condemning p&o s actions. so nowl want to take the opportunity to put i want to take the opportunity to put on record want to take the opportunity to put on record my shock and my dismay at the insensitive and brutal treatment of its employees yesterday. sacked! sacked of its employees yesterday. sa