unclassified information as opposed to classified. brian: let s get this straight. unclassified information for the one person in the white house, not a terror expert, not an intelligence expert, an ambassador to the u.n. given unclassified information on five national shows. if those are the facts, i don t know where to start. eric: we have a bigger problem if general petraeus testifies that it was not the video and it was, in fact, terror. now two months later with four days into the mess, he said it was a response to the video. then this. this is the c.i.a. time line. this is the time line that they put together and put out and all through it, it shows there was a drone watching over. there were mortars,rbg s. the problem is if general petraeus says it was terror
willing to put his personnel out on the line with wrong information? with information that he knew was wrong or had reason to know was wrong. it doesn t make sense. the president needs to take ownership of this and in uation like this where brave americans died serving their country. we deserve more explanation. gretchen: you are not getting the answers from the president and he will not just willingly give them and unless you call him to testify which would not happen. how do you achieve the goal. we ll and questions of other personnel. we can t get them from the president himself what about the members of the white house staff and cabinet. brian: how are you going to approach the questioning of general pettigrew knowing he is a citizen and can let it fly. what do you expect and hope to get today? we live nay society in
today, then who told him to say it was the video? someone had to lean on him and for what reason. brian: he says, according to katherine herrage, he does not know who briefed ambassador rice. eric: who briefed him? brian: he was able to get real time information from people on the scene, i imagine. he says he has no idea who provided information to rice or who was the author of the information that she read. he had no idea who was going to talk on the shows til the white house release on friday and saturday who was on the sunday talk shows. eric: a four star general who had access, who allegedly had access to video, via drone and/or security who went and briefed i believe senate and house intelligence committee saying it was a response to a video. it may have been under oath or not, did you gretchen: we ve learned that whether or not he was under oath that there is a requirement obviously that you tell the truth. eric: correct.
rockets before israel launches a ground war. back to you in new york. gretchen: that s an important point. thank you so much. brian: you have an egyptian official going there. they re going to be there sometime today. they re not going to have invasion when the egyptian official is there. morsi is were under incredible pressure to break with israel, condemn with israel. gretchen: and libya and what happened in benghazi? the testimony today, general david petraeus will sit down in a closed door meeting under oath and say what he think actually happened. remember originally he said it was the videotape. will he change his story now? sources telling fox news that he will say that it was a terrorist attack. in the meantime, it seems like what was going on yesterday on capitol hill was a little heated because there seemed to be some interesting information that was coming out with regard to susan rice and when she went on those talk shows. now they re saying she was given
inconsistent moving target story on us. he attacks several senators for critizing for ambassador rice for not having the right information, saying it is my fault, but he doesn t explain why she had the wrong information and why she was continuing to say many, many days after the attacks took place and the white house was put on notice and these were terrorist attacks and this was a product of a spontanous flash mob. brian: you got a chance to see the video and interior and exterror of the actul event. if people want to know why susan rice said what she . the cia gave her unclassified briefing before going on five net work shows to represent the view of the white house, does anything make sense about that? no. this is the bigger question that has to be answered. why is it that the president of the united states is