releasing his taxes or talking to the mueller investigation or having his top officials cooperate with the ukraine probe. the president always sings the exact same tune with the exact same lyrics before doing the exact opposite. i would love to speak. i would love to. nobody wants to speak more than me. i d love to have mick go up, frankly. i think he d do great. when the audit is complete, i ll release my turns. i have no problem with it. it doesn t matter. i would love to speak. i would love to go. nothing i want to do more. would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version of 100%. are you going to talk to mueller? i m looking forward to it actually. he d love to but he left a pot on the stove, got a term paper to write. ultimately the answer is always no which if he said so up front would be honest, at this point novel. the tweeted kind of a word salad on the impeachment inquiry ending with, quote, shouldn t be allowed. can we go to the supreme court to
turnout, about 30% versus the primary a month ago. and also those suburban areas becoming much more democratic. not just in the north anymore. it s in the south as well. it s going to be very interesting to see how places like texas and arizona sort of move in 2020. and 2018 had a similar dynamic. harry entin, great to have you, as always. thanks, harry. cnn investigation, following the money in the ukraine probe and allegations of a shakedown. we ll have the details, next. there s a company that s talked to even more real people than me: jd power. 448,134 to be exact. they answered 410 questions in 8 categories about vehicle quality. and when they were done, chevy earned more j.d. power quality awards across cars, trucks and suvs than any other brand over the last four years. so on behalf of chevrolet, i want to say thank you, real people. you re welcome. we re gonna need a bigger room.
there s doubt about this case, about whether it s true, or maybe it happened but it s not serious enough to merit impeachment. reporter: high stakes heading into a potentially explosive week of testimony. erica hill, cnn, new york. last week, we heard from several officials in the ukraine probe. house minority whip steve scalise tried to discredit them. but fox news chris wallace shut him down. take a listen. the real bottom line is he got the money. ukraine got the money, chris. first of all, a dozen people listened in on the phone call and a number of them were immediately upset because what the president said about burisma. those were schiff s witnesses. no, sir. they re career foreign service officers and these are people who worked in the trump administration. they re schiff s witnesses. there are other witnesses we ve sir, you had a woman yesterday who was on vice president pence s staff. she said it was inappropriate.
sensationalizing the impeachment inquiry, but completely ignoring the booming economy. brand-new testimony from critical impeachment witnesses, none of it good for the president. lots of bad news for this president today. an historic first week of televised hearings in the impeachment investigation of donald trump. is it impeachment worthy? heather: did you even know this happened, the dow soaring past 28,000 for the first time in history and getting next to no coverage. so why is the media silent when it comes to the president s wins? here to weigh in, former chief economist for the u.s. international trade commission, peter mauricey. thank you for joining us. we appreciate it. nice to be with you. heather: let s take a look at this, as you begin our discussion. when you look at the mainstream media coverage, a full 398 minutes dedicated to the impeachment, ukraine probe, 45 minutes on the successful killing of the isis leader, abu
doesn t want to be a public figure. there are some parallels to mike pence, although these are different stories, but i ve been interested in the last several days to watch some of the figures who are getting drawn into this ukraine probe and kwi impeachment inquiry are trying to find the safe distance to hold back, the right to engage publicly, because the closer you get to the center of the story, the hotter it gets. you know, barr is an interesting case because we don t hear from him that much, but we see the impacts of his actions and i think the president is embarrassed by the idea that it would be out there in the press, the idea that he wanted something and his attorney general didn t give it to him. but barr s decisions may actually have protected the president in this case. i m not sure president trump really wanted barr to go out and do that. well, he wanted, but is it in his best interests? again, we go back to what we ll talk about in just a minute.