combined with all of the other things that are happening and in particular that press conference that we ve been talking about. ann, look, it does, the press conference and mulvaney is a key player in the ukraine probe and according to taylor, he s the one that directed the omb to withhold the aid. he s there and he s with the president and he s passing on that command and he said there was a quid pro quo and get over it. so now all of a sudden, if he is left out and if he is scorned, could he turn on the president? you know, it s an interesting question, but i m highly skeptical that he ll turn and the reason why having been a local, federal and state prosecutor is that people usually turn when they re staring down the barrel of a crime, of basically going to jail or prison and there s a huge incentive for them to become cooperators. right now i just don t see that mulvaney has that incentive to cooperate with the investigation and so i would expect him to not cooperate for as lon
the witness who gave last week s bombshell testimony in the ukraine probe ambassador bill taylor today was back at work in ukraine. nbc was actually there reporting he got quite the quote rock star reception and also featured the ukrainian president, that s the same leader on the receiving end of pressure from the trump administration. nbc s ana sheckter asked president zelensky all about it. did you feel any pressure from president trump? and i have no answers about there s no more answers. i ve said already, no, that s it. thank you very much. no more answers but thank you for asking the question. zelensky clearly not interested in talking about it in that form in that way, which itself suggests there may still be issues between these two
FOXNEWS Your World With Neil Cavuto October 24, 2019 20:15:45 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
he was being asked to engage as a private citizen. none of those privileges can apply in that sense. so actually rick perry, for example, has a few more arguments than a lewandowsky. i think what was so critical in that testimony when lewandowsky testified that people need to understand is it s not so easy for congress to use its inherent authority to hold someone in contempt. it s so underutilized. there s not a lot of case law around it, and it would be quite explosive. i think what we re seeing now with the ukraine probe is they don t have to wait anymore. they have articles of impeachment. they could vote now just from what we ve seen in the public sphere in terms of evidence. there is sufficient evidence for impeachment right now. susan page, you and i have been around for a minute, and we ve seen and covered a few stories. two-part question for you. number one, can you please describe among your friends and
he was a campaign employee. he was a private citizen. he was being asked to engage as a private citizen. none of those privileges can apply in that sense. so actually rick perry, for example, he s a few more arguments than a lewandowski. i think what was so critical in that testimony when lewandowski testified that people need to understand is, it s not so easy for congress to use its inherent authority to hold someone in contempt. it s so underutilized, there s not a lot of case law around it and it would be quite explosive. what we re seeing now with the ukraine probe is they don t have to wait anymore. they have articles of impeachment. they could vote now, just from what we ve seen in the public sphere in terms of evidence. there is such evidence for impeachment right now. susan page, you and i have been around for a minute, and we ve seen and covered a few stories. two-part question for you. number one, can you please