0 it was like, i gotta get ahead of, i was really excited, to be honest, as a fan. i just got a little sight. i was like, i m curious to see what rachael has to say about all of this tomorrow. so that was my reaction. one out that i know that you like to keep it, you know, spicy. right up to the end, one of these times i m going to sneak into your prompter and put on, now, next on msnbc, vanilla ice. i m like anchor man. i ll read anything. you re tempting me. it will happen. thank you. much appreciated. thanks for joining us this hour. happy to have you here. you re getting more of me than you bargained for this week. i m sorry. if everything goes as planned which is never in the news business but you can t break them unless you make them in the first place, if all goes as planned, i will be here tonight hosting the rachel maddow show and tomorrow night as well at my usual time 9:00 p.m. hosting, tuesday night, wednesday night and thursday night i will be here as well. but
andy mccarthy, fox news contributor, former assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york. so andy, i want to lean hard on this. yes, there is movement, they want the house to do something. something on capitol hill. but we have 18 u.s. code 1503 and 1507 that are meant to protect all judges and jurors. why is this administration not leaning in and using the laws that are already on the book without the excuse of well, we just can t come together on capitol hill? they don t come together on everything. we already have law. we do have law. they aren t enforcing it and they aren t enforcing it because they re politically aligned with the people doing the protesting. they aren t upset about the protesting. they are upset about being asked why they don t enforce the law. in our system, the judiciary is the non-political branch, right? our line with respect to
trump. who would have ever suspected that a creature like donald trump would become president of the united states waving a list of judges that he would appoint getting the support of the far right and appointing those anti-freedom justices to the court? harris: watch this. i don t have an official u.s. government position on where people protest. but we do. it s wrong. it s intimidation. it s against the law. look, it s not terribly violent obviously but would you want this outside your house? harris: 18 u.s. code 15.03 i ve read it many times. the connection between nancy pelosi and bill maher. there is not an institution in
so he is okay with this, senator it doesn t matter as long as they go peaceful he says people outside private homes of justices. the focus of this is clear it s intimidation. they leak this draft and to hopefully theirt view is that would allow people to get out and intimidate and change the opinion of these justices they are in the process and a liberation there s u.s. code against this. they are standing by and watching the lobby violated by these protesters it s intimidation i pray does not get any worse. but it is very, very disheartening it s against a lot a part of the democrats strategizing to deflect from the real issues that americans are worried about. the real issues have most of the country understand we are doing the wrong direction. this is yet another reflection by the democrats to try to get theel american public to look te other way. had and it will be watching that keep the focus on what matters to the american people for sure. thanks for much for being here thi
barrett has five biological and two adopted children. the fact that they is an adopted mother inability to know what it s like to carry a pregnancy to term. durbin broke with many of his party on the issue of protesting these justices. i think it s reprehensible. stay away from homes and families of elected officials and members of the court. a slight from the white house and senate majority leader who signaled support. protests are peaceful, yes. my house there are protests three or four times aweek outside my house. that s the american way to peacefully protest is okay. there is a difference between protesting a politician and a judge. title 18, section 15.07 of u.s. code says it s illegal with the intent of influencing a judge to pickets or parades in or