Of under utilized parking garages on sundays like 13 . I think the december report shows that good benefits of the policy, and i feel that reversing it and rolling it back is not a step towards the transit first city. I feel like its a step towards car dominant city and thats the total opposite direction i want to go as a supervisor on this board. All just say that the appellants have raised some good issues and i hear the legal arguments from some of my colleagues, but i do feel that framing categorical exemption or statutory exemption is really the legalese of what youve done, which is tucking important issue that needed much more environmental analysis. So, thats why ill be supporting the appeal. Colleagues, lets take a roll call vote. Madam clerk . Supervisor campos . Can we have a motion . Supervisor wieners motion to affirm the statutory exemption. Aye. Campos aye. Supervisor chiu . Chiu aye. Supervisor cohen . Cohen aye. Supervisor farrell . Farrell aye. Supervisor kim . Kim aye
Good afternoon, [speaker not understood], and members of the board. Ten years ago the board of supervisors was advised by the Planning Commission that a negative declaration was appropriate for this Housing Element 2004. Now, ten years later they still are debating that issue because this board relied on good faith that the Planning Commissions recommendations were solid. Once again, the Planning Commission is recommending now that the certification of a final eir, which is the attorney [speaker not understood] and 14 neighborhood organizations have appealed. And once again, theyre trying to really persuade the board to abandon the kind of compliance that has been acted upon in the past with the Planning Commission, which has not been in accordance with the law. The appeal by the attorney, over 30 pageses, justifies the merits of the appeal. I urge you to support the appeal and to bring an end to this process where the city is continually elevating ceqa. And in the process, hopefully t
Park [speaker not understood], Member Coalition San Francisco neighborhoods. I sent you an email earlier at 1 05 p. M. Today and it includes a letter, i have 12 copies here for distribution if youd like in case the email is kind of not transmitted well. I would like to say the following thing. Earlier in this meeting you did pass and adopt a resolution for the 2009 Housing Element. And what i wanted to say is its the First Reading only. However, i wanted to add a statement that could be put in the ordinance to quantify or to clarify what happened at the board of supervisors Land Use Committee meeting in terms of the neighborhood character that a lot of our constituents and many of your districts are concerned with. And, so, i want to make sure that item on page 3 of that document, the ordinance that was attached to file number 1404 14 that you earlier passed, on june 9, 2014 by motion no. Xxxxx, five xs, for whatever number that ways, the board of supervisors land use and Economic Deve