i had little input into that inquiry. i was there on the day of the interview but any pre or post work would have been by the person in charge of the inquiry. i5 person in charge of the inquiry. is a you had nothing to do with endorsing the content of the report? no. , ., endorsing the content of the report? no. , . , ., , no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when - no. diane matthews told the inquiry that she was shocked when janet . that she was shocked when janet skinner was charged with theft. where you? this skinner was charged with theft. where you? skinner was charged with theft. where ou? a , where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. where you? as i say, miss matthews is the one who sourced it. i - where you
refused on, essentially, the decision of view, mr bradshaw. you know that, don t you? mrs macdonald leaded know that, don t you? mrs macdonald pleaded guilty know that, don t you? mrs macdonald pleaded guilty to know that, don t you? mrs macdonald pleaded guilty to false know that, don t you? mrs macdonald pleaded guilty to false accounting. - pleaded guilty to false accounting. . at a later date she pleaded guilty to theft. ,, . . at a later date she pleaded guilty to theft. ,, i, ., , i, . at a later date she pleaded guilty to theft. , i, i, , i, , to theft. she wanted to plead guilty to theft. she wanted to plead guilty to false accounting, to theft. she wanted to plead guilty to false accounting, you to theft. she wanted to plead guilty to false accounting, you persuaded | to false accounting, you persuaded her otherwise. she to false accounting, you persuaded her otherwise. to false accounting, you persuaded her otherwise. she pleaded guilty to false accountin
campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier. campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier- a campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier. a flamboyant campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier. a flamboyant way campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier. a flamboyant way of - earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? yes. earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? yes. it earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? yes. it can t - earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? yes. it can t be, l earlier. a flamboyant way of i explaining? yes. it can t be, can it? because explaining? yes. it can t be, can it? because that explaining? yes. it can t be, can it? because that is explaining? yes. it can t be, can it? because that is a explaining? fez it can t be, can it? because that is a motivation, explaining? ies it can t be, can it? because that is a motivation, it is not a fact. it is clear from the document that ensuring that n
was given to the postmasters campaign, where due?- was given to the postmasters campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier. campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier- a campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier. a flamboyant campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier. a flamboyant way campaign, where due? no, i explained earlier. a flamboyant way of - earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? yes. earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? yes. it earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? yes. it can t i earlier. a flamboyant way of explaining? yes. it can t be, l earlier. a flamboyant way of i explaining? yes. it can t be, can it? because explaining? yes. it can t be, can it? because that explaining? yes. it can t be, can it? because that is explaining? yes. it can t be, can it? because that is a explaining? 123 it can t be, can it? because that is a motivation, it is not a fact. it is clear from the document that en
but i simply tell them they ll get uninvited. everybody pays up. it just makes budgets sense and spreads the cost fairly between everyone at the table. so at the jenkins family table are you considering this? i can t steal nicole s notes and i don t type notes. i just do pictures. surfing scene right there. look, i would love to see the grandmother force a 3-year-old to cough up 3 bucks. what 3-year-old has $3. i want to meet that i canned. griff: might teach responsibility. that child might grow up and never be late on a payment. there could be an educational purpose. you are taking way too seriously. this grandmother wants her family together and she s probably on fixed income and can t afford it. you know the irs is going after her venmo. you better watch out. here is another lesson in this.