the same way our leaders run our country. they yammer on endlessly g abour itmocracy, but then at the same time, they do their best to a avoid democracy s most basic requirements, like free speechel and representative government. e a few years ago, the prime minister of italy at the time, paolo gentiloni, bragged tow ye the world economic forum about his plans to, quote, bring more social justice to the country by what she meant, importing many more thousands of poorly educated economic migrants from the third world into italy. we are very open on migration, he said. we are saving lives at sea, a saving lives.oo congratulations. you re such a good person. but the question is , and it s a relevant question in a democracy, what are the people who live in italy that would be your constituents? think of that idea. well, as the prime ministert? explained, he didn t care, quot: quote, a demand for more democracy not only is wrong, it s even dangerous.llows you following this, you
you re always you re tired,e john . you re looking real tireind. i m taking one for labor day and then we re coming back and we re going to hit the ground running hard. go .ow i ll be here tomorrow night. there s a lot out there. sean, thank yo u. eciatenk yo have a great show. i appreciate it. well, i m jason chaffetz in for laura ingraham. this is a special edition of the ingraham angle from new york city tonight. there was a time in politicst when disparaged half of your fellow countrymen, especially if you sought to lead them was political suicidet . 47% comments are not going to help mitt romney s popularity. 47% is bad enough. i it s haunting romney and his campaign. it has been a brutal for mitt romney in the wake of his 47% comments. recent events in mistakes on romney s part have hurt him with specifically the 47 percent comment he made in florida and things like that. comm mad47% comment.ike that. they really do have pot the potential to hurt. but of course,
god rest his soul, what could that be ? warrior? he he he had the way of, like cutting through an issue with a smile on his face. ce i and i knew him since i was a young lawyer. i just started in practicing law. i ha him. mwn tribute to i m so glad you did that, sean,n because he was a wonderful person and a brilliant legal mind. we re not going to see anyone like him any time soon. so thank you for those words for him.r and i ll i ll.th he ll be missed. i ll tryoso it.e words. i ll try to do it. justice at the end of this show. but thank you so much and great show as always. even with the time. all right.s with i m laura ingraham.e tide. this is ingram angle from washington.washington ton tonight. we re going to get right to. th it. the brutal truthe brutal. that s the focus of tonight s angle. . all right. kim karhian has big news. kim kardashian is expanding her brand once again. your brand og a private equity firm with jay simmons, a sixteeequityn year veteran of th
news that our economy had zero percent inflation in the month of julyy, zero percent. okay, we ll have more on that a little bit later in the show, i promise. but first, there never been a more important day for the permanent washington time than inauguration day for joe biden. january 20th last year it was moment democrats and their voters in the federal bureaucracy have been waiting for for four years. none of it had to do with joe biden or possibilities his presidency could bring to them.t the best part about joe biden taking office was donald trump was leaving office, although it was made possible because somehow voters during a pandemicus had accomplished what, four years off witch hunts, pausing to investigate the full force of surveillance state could not removing donald trump from the white house despite getting seventy four million votes. but it quickly becameus clear removing donald trump was not the end goal. believe it or not, almost immediately joe biden and his
americans and their governmentm. a decade ago. the new york times admitted this. the times markedis the anniversary of 9/11 by publishinhed a piecg a piece on the rise of domestic surveillance abuses which explode after the 9/11 attacks. the patriot act, according to st the new york times, quote, govem quickly became a sort of shorthand for government abusenh and overreaching, which, quote, inflicted collateral damage on political dissent, religiousl liberty and the freedom of association, end quote. that is still true, in fact, truer than it s ever been,trage. and it is still a tragedy. what s fascinating is that stopd the new york times has stoppedi acknowledging it. in fact, remarkablity, there wae not a single mention oft page o the 9/11 anniversaryf yesterday. on the front page of yesterday s paper, the paper that purports to represent new york , the epicenter of the 9/11 attacks. now, why would the new york times ignore 9/11? ignore well, good question, be the new york