procedural questions are litigated. the key words here, for now. for now, it is indeed the law in texas and could quickly become the law in many other states. but let s hope the decisions of the lone star state do not become our judicial north star. congressman jamie raskin is here. what s he think democrats priorities should be when all this is going on? i ll ask him right after this. finish quantum, nh you save up to 20 gallons of water each time. finish quantum with activblu technology has the power to remove the toughest stains without pre-rinsing for dishes so clean they shine. join finish and skip the rinse to save our water.
sweltering temperatures. i mean firesre burning through cafornia andevada. the bottom line is thousands of americanare not sleepingn their mes toght because of and our politics have tued exeme to the preme court s coervati majority allowing a new texas law to stand, a law that effectivelbans the vast majority oaborons, a law at allows now privatcitize toue anyone who assist someone seeking an abortion in octors and family member to abortion appointments they uld all face lawsus, and the court let it happen under the cover of darkness. let s get right he latest on the historic flooding in the northeast. i want tgo livto our reporteron the ground. miguel marquez is in new brunswk, new jersey.
he believes that it s a woman s right. it s a woman s body, and it s her choice. who does he believe then should look out for the unborn child? he believes it s up to a woman to make those decisions and up to a woman to make those decisions with her doctor. i know you ve never faced those choices nor have you ever been pregnant. but for women out there who have faced those choices, this is an krublly difficult thing. the president believes that right should be respected. under the cover of darkness, five supreme court justices felt that they were the ones that had no choice, no choice but to let texas enact the law despite the fact that the groups suing to block it raised serious questions regarding its constitutionality. because the supreme court said in the majority the case raised some complex and some very novel aspects. now, remind me which supreme court cases haven t been novel or complex in some way? i thought that s why they paid you the proverbial big bucks, to