his work, he is looking at the issue of motive. what is the possible motive for why the russians might want to help trump during the campaign? and the obvious place to look is financial. was there some sort of financial relationship between trump and the russians that would lead to some sort of marriage of the minds there and that means he has to look at tax returns, business relationships, and that drives the president nuts. there is a don t protest too much factor to this. the president laid down a red line saying mueller shouldn t look too far into the family s finances. pharrell has been doing digging into exactly that. what we ve learned is that he s taking a broad view of the investigation and not a narrow view. so what he was given in midmay is open to interpretation and anything that might have resulted in interference in the
they were talking about his businesses. the investigation expanding to businesses. and now the question is has anything been taken from those businesses like hard drives. but there are other options on the table beyond the ones you re mentioning. i ve been hearing they re trying to rain mueller in and one of the options include trying to look at for the president to look at who would be over top of mueller. meaning who would guide mueller in this process because currently it s the u.s. deputy attorney general rosenstein. but the president is not happy with rosenstein. so if he does something, he can do it by executive order. and he could also look at firing rosenstein and bringing in the number three person who is rachel brand who is a supporter of president trump and would
beginning when they said that sean spicer had too much on his plate. by being press secretary and coms director. so they had to hire another spokesporousn to leave sean spicer. well, they did fill it and that person s no longer there. he s gone for quite some time with no one in that position and it s my understanding if they get someone in this role, sean s not going away. they re moving people around and repositioning people and finding new responsibilities and paths for them to do. so this is part of what happens isn t this a sign of the president s dissatisfaction that he s not happy? he s indicated that before and there s been reports on that. but in their defense, when they re otthere trying to push a message made in america week and
possible new communications director for the white house? yes, as if this night doesn t seem news worthy or chaotic enough. they re all reporting. but scaramucci is under consideration for white house communications director. right now sean spicer has that title. it s unclear what this move might mean for spicer. but he s a friend of the president s. he enjoyed watching scaramucci defend him. he was at the white house today. he s been interviewed for the job. there s a sense the president would like to appoint him communications director but it s not official yet. the are eporting that he s under consideration for the job. another sign of a shake up in the press shop and in the communications strategy. do you remember in the
it takes you off the topic. i m wondering why is it so difficult to find someone to fill that position and everyone here who cares. we can t see them. the president would give an interview to the new york times. who approved that interview and the person who approved it, they should be fired because they allowed this to happen. the more we hear from the president the better. i m talking as a strategy for the white house. we have a saying in crisis management that you can t talk your way out of hurricane katrina when the news when donald trump in the role of hurricane katrina. there s no communications strategy that can make what is happening better. and what is happening is a president who is undermining an independent investigation and possibly going to use the presidential pardon power to