will comply with congress s request and it is itself overrides fox news s nda. do you view this ever been it gets to a subpoena level, this requests itself as something you can comply with regard of fox news for your client s silence? yes. anybody throughout. anybody in your audience who has an nda must know the law requires that you be allowed to participate in any government investigation and no nda can stop that. joining me now is new york times investigative reporter who has been all over these stories and jacob weisburg had the original details before anyone. thanks to both you have for being here. happy to be here. i ll start with the easiest question. as a reporter would you be interested in hearing what the rest of what this ex-fox news reporter stay or should she stay
you get the final word. all i m saying is virtually every democratic and the majority and now close to majority of the country doesn t want the wall built at all and never have. howard fineman, always like chopping it up with you on a friday. thanks for being here. turning next to beat exclusive on this letter new from congress. nda stormy daniels and why fox news could be on the end of this scoop. we re back in 30 seconds. f this scoop. we re back in 30 seconds
locked up under this nda. i don t think we congress to approve fox news is a propaganda. that s your opinion. i think they would have suppressed the stormy daniels story but i doubt they had it in a usable form. i was pursuing the storm and i remember stormy daniels mentioning she was one of the reporters she was talking to. she decided to take the money from trump instead of going public. it was clear not only would she participate in the story, she was going to deny it. her lawyer was going to deny it. the evidence without her backing it up, with her denying it wasn t sufficient. i think fox s motives could be terrible but she didn t have it in a defensible form. that s important that both things could be true.
could be even worse than mueller. we re hearing directly, for the first time from a witness, vo involved in the sdny probe. keith davidson. we were discussing how extense imp his communica ive his communication has been. about 1500 pages i gave to sdny upon their request. i will make that available to house judiciary committee. i sat down with the sdny prosecutors. they were about the most comp tent attorneys i met. for a time period of three separate meetings of about 20 hours in total. 20 hours. 1500 pages of material. that s a key piece of information from a witness in the probe. that was his first time since he spoke to them. davidson is a key figure because he negotiated both of those ndas. we just don t know who else is talking. we know michael cohen after being indicted there was
final thought. you have to recognize anybody worked on stories in which women have been silenced by these secret settlements know the moment your subject has been silenced it s hard to get to publication with them. right. i think that s fair point that fwo goes to why there s a larger context. we ll see whether they have the evidence or not. it s one more story that didn t go to press. thanks to both you have for being here. rare look inside the sdny trump probe from a witness who has been discussing with both of the people there that you see involving trump nda s and jeru if da the da plrmaja is here. e da pmae his entire platoon was standing next to him. they kept telling me, you gotta push! you gotta push! they all got to meet forest, all together. about 50 of them. and they all started crying.