as a liberal that believes in privacy, i would assume, they shouldn t have leaked a conversation when they were surveilling not general flynn but the russian ambassador that s illegal. it s a violation of the espionage act and that ended up in his career up in smoke. that s more important. i don t condone illegal leaks or the illegal leaks of wikileaks either. i have been very consistent on both sides that i don t like them releasing that kind of illegal information. sean: maybe hillary if she would keep her email server where it s supposed to be and not in a bath room closet and the if oh did hes sta didn t fall for fishing scams that s not donald trump s problem. there are skilled and honest reporters covering the white house the right now. there are other people waking up every morning looking for the silver but let that s going to kill the trump monster. there are journalists like that. the daily mail has been good at
believes in privacy, i assume, they shouldn t have leaked from the intelligence community s conversation when they were surveilling, not general flynn, but the russian ambassador, that is illegal. that is a violation of the espionage act, and that ended up going up in smoke. i would think on that issue, that is more important. awoke, i don t condone illegal leaks, and i don t conde the illegal leaks of wikileaks either. i ve been very consistent on both sides that i don t like them releasing that kind of illegal information. sean: maybe hillary, david, if she would keep her email server where it is supposed to be and not put it in a mom-and-pop bathroom closet, that is not donald trump s fault. it s not. let s be very honest about this. there are some very skilled, honest, and smart reporters covering the white house right now, but there are also people who are just waking up every morning looking for the silver bullet that is going to kill the trump monster. one of the things th
believes in privacy, i assume, they shouldn t have leaked from the intelligence community s conversation when they were surveilling, not general flynn, but the russian ambassador, that is illegal. that is a violation of the espionage act, and that ended up going up in smoke. i would think on that issue, that is more important. awoke, i don t condone illegal leaks, and i don t conde the illegal leaks of wikileaks either. i ve been very consistent on both sides that i don t like them releasing that kind of illegal information. sean: maybe hillary, david, if she would keep her email server where it is supposed to be and not put it in a mom-and-pop bathroom closet, that is not donald trump s fault. it s not. let s be very honest about this. there are some very skilled, honest, and smart reporters covering the white house right now, but there are also people who are just waking up every morning looking for the silver bullet that is going to kill the trump monster. one of the things th