mark: hello america i am mark levin this is life liberty and love and sunday. don t you think the democrat party has a responsibility, indeed an obligation to nominate somebody who knows how to walk and doesn t bump into the walls and complete sentences. don t you think they have an obligation to nominate 70 for president who spends most of his time on the job rather than 40% on vacation and part of the other 60% in his basement. don t you think the democrat party has responsibility to nominate somebody who will engage with differently media on a regular basis which is supposed to help the american people know what s going on in the country. don t you think the democrat party has responsibility to nominate somebody who is going to secure the border rather than promote sex slavery, modern-day slavery like we ve never seen on a seven burner, will help stop sstop that not another killer drug scavenger country and killing our people. don t you think the democrat party has an obli
mark: hello america i am mark levin this is life liberty and love and sunday. don t you think the democrat party has a responsibility, indeed an obligation to nominate somebody who knows how to walk and doesn t bump into the walls and complete sentences. don t you think they have an obligation to nominate 70 for president who spends most of his time on the job rather than 40% on vacation and part of the other 60% in his basement. don t you think the democrat party has responsibility to nominate somebody who will a regular basis which ismedi supposed to help the american people know what s going on in the country. don t you think the democrat party has responsibility to nominate somebody who is going to secure the border rather than promote sex slavery, modern-day slavery like we ve never seen on a seven burner, will help stop sestop that not another killer drug scavenger country and killing our people. don t you think the democrat party has an obligation to nominate somebody
mark: hello america i am mark levin this is life liberty and love and sunday. don t you think the democrat party has a responsibility, indeed an obligation to nominate somebody who knows how to walk and doesn t bump into the walls and complete sentences. don t you think they have an obligation to nominate 70 for president who spends most of his time on the job rather than 40% on vacation and part of the other 60% in his basement. don t you think the democrat party has responsibility to nominate somebody who will engage with differently media on a regular basis which is supposed to help the american people know what s going on in the country. don t you think the democrat party has responsibility to nominate somebody who is going to secure the border rather than promote sex slavery, modern-day slavery like we ve never seen on a seven burner, will help stop sestop that not another killer drug scavenger country and killing our people. don t you think the democrat party has an obl
tonight on all in. enough, i said please don t be too nice. donald trump admits he crossed the line, but demands immunity, like a cop who gets away with breaking the law. the president of the united states, must have immunity. tonight, the dark implications of trump s new manifesto. then, the latest attack on e. jean carroll inside the trump defamation trial. plus. let s just wait and see what happens in new hampshire. if nikki haley wins new hampshire, that i think we ve got a race in our hands. if polling and new expectations settings for the next vote in new hampshire has global elites warned the indicted ex president. i don t think voting for trump s family values, but he wasn t wrong about some of these critical issues. all in starts right now. good evening from new york, i m chris hayes. we are awaiting a ruling from the d.c. circuit court of appeals on donald trump s audacious and a dangerous claim of near total presidential immunity, for crim
and could face no criminal accountability or prosecution, unless he was first successfully impeached and convicted. could a president ordered s. e. a. l. team six to assassinate a political rival? that s an official act, in order to s. e. a. l. team six? he would have to be, and would speedily be impeached and convicted before the criminal prosecution. but if you weren t? there would be no criminal prosecution, no criminal liability for that? in the chief justices opinion and our constitution, and in the plain language of the impeachment judgment clause, all clearly presuppose that what the founders were concerned about was not. i asked you a yes or no question. could a president who ordered s. e. a. l. team six to assassinate a political rival, who was not impeached, could he be subject to criminal prosecution? if he were impeached and convicted first. so your answer is? my answer is qualified yes. it was always clear that these weren t particularly s