cohen, by saying it publicly is it witness tampering? based on what i ve seen so far on any of the comments, as reprehensible as they are, they re not witness tampering and they re not obstruction because there s nothing to indicate that they re being done, quote, corruptly. supreme court had a case that touched upon this. the author anderson case about ten years ago, 15 years ago and 9-0 they said you need something more than just impeding an investigation. it s got to be corrupt. there s got to be some kind of dishonesty involved vis-a-vis the government. so we need to distinguish between conduct that is thuggish, conduct that is the behavior of a political mobster, which is what you re seeing from the president, and conduct that constitutes criminal obstruction of justice. and i don t see it based on what we ve seen so far. i m sorry, go ahead. i m curious, when you were with starr, doing the ken starr
be replaced by nafta-2. i think there s a sense now in the economy, the markets and stock market, well, what if they have unleashed something here they can t quite control. maybe it s the bluffing, the talk back and forth that you described is a little bit more dangerous. this won t be as easy to put back into the tooth paste tube. and announcing before china goes back to the relationship that the president says he has with xi jingping. he did the same thing with north korea. the president is always playing to the media, what s the headline that will rile my base. but people are saying we need stance now, and the market is demonstrating they don t have the substance. on reality tv the market doesn t go down 800 points if you as the star say something ahead of one of the guests. i had a blast there watching