why did they vote against your amendment banning the f16s. we need to make sure the country stays stable? some people see it as a make work project. with give them money they ll buy weapons from us and that creates jobs. if that were true why don t we give countries around the world money to buy our cars. it s foolish. but then some of them say, well, they won t let us use the suez canal. my response to that is, they should want us to use the suez canal because there are fees for going through the came. they should want to be participating in trade because we send them food because they can t feed themselves. so, we don t have to pay england to be our friend. why do we have to pay egypt to be our friend? i think before we send them anything, they should act like our friend and not burn our flag and let a mob get on top of our embassy and chant, death to america. it s a huge mistake to send them
2004 and the 2010 off-year election then the independents are going to swing it because party identifier these days are strong partisans. you are getting 90-plus percentage of democrats for obama and 90% republicans voting for romney. weir we ll see something other than a 1% race in the presidential contest. megyn: if that s true why don t we see bigger numbers for mitt romney in states like ohio and iowa and these other critical states that may be required for him to win. we have seen in ohio romney has been leading among independents in most polls. but a lot of those statewide polls have been getting electorates that in party identification terms are more democratic than 2008. that seems counter intuitive. but those are the results they are getting. i think there may be some systemic problem with the polls,
it. lanny davis himself said it. solomon. solomon said it about the column. jim garety had nothing to do with it. he wrote david jackson white house reporter from the usa today said we get this stuff all the time. his point is if that s true why don t we hear more about that. bob: do you believe they threaten the credentials? dana: sure. look what happened to local reporters in silicon valley when they wanted to cover the obama campaign event. they got shut out of it. cheryl atknson of cbs news, let alone what they do to fox. it s a tactics and it works for them but i don t think it represents the president well. plus, it s sowing a field of distrust that is going to hurt president obama. being able to get anything done. bob: the other arguments, i m listening to, they are probably telling the truth.
it. lanny davis himself said it. solomon. solomon said it about the column. jim garety had nothing to do with it. he wrote david jackson white house reporter from the usa today said we get this stuff all the time. his point is if that s true why don t we hear more about that. bob: do you believe they threaten the credentials? dana: sure. look what happened to local reporters in silicon valley when they wanted to cover the obama campaign event. they got shut out of it. cheryl atknson of cbs news, let alone what they do to fox. it s a tactics and it works for them but i don t think it represents the president well. plus, it s sowing a field of distrust that is going to hurt president obama. being able to get anything done. bob: the other arguments, i m listening to, they are probably telling the truth.