Bought out before the developers this kind of unit rather than bought it a month in january of discourage it but if you 2013 and, of course, immediately supervisor jane kim if you are tried to demolish it so theres considering we put up we been tenant pretty Much Required the owner to provide continuing so discussion about additional affordable but their what could be developed it is though the building luxury unit pretty much wide open 7 units could be put on the lot without in in my opinion i will in the Richmond District for a a long the subdivision you need a 25 time with 3 bedroom new united percent raider but you could for 11 hundred secret its really affordable expand it i dont know about the thank you. Next speaker. Discussion you cant add a rear hi, im amy lee im not not yard if you could have the working on this project but overhead please. Speaking as a resident of the sfgovtv. Richmond district im a single this is the code required mom of 3 id love to have those rear yard o
2013 and, of course, immediately tried to demolish it so theres been tenant pretty much continuing so discussion about what could be developed it is pretty much wide open 7 units could be put on the lot without the subdivision you need a 25 percent raider but you could expand it i dont know about the discussion you cant add a rear yard if you could have the overhead please. Sfgovtv. This is the code required rear yard of 25 percent which the neighbors is fine the present could be expanded if built right could fall under rent control they can add more rent control unit by expanding the building so the thought were trapped into options we dont have is not true heres with the developers the department asked them to do a 25 percent rear yard on both of the rear lots there are a lot of confusion the lots have not obey subdivided its one lot heres what the department pretty much asks for 25 percent of each lot at ground floor they saw an exception and said the reason we need this exception w
Speaking as a resident of the Richmond District im a single mom of 3 id love to have those size of rental apartment this is a city that is favorable unfriendly with one bedroom studios ive moved to the richmond and stuck in a house this is too expensive because theyre not unit like this available to families like myself i felt strongly but this project and feel for marching she is he is so developed previous projects that are skeptic to the community and i understand you guys have an important citywide policy with affordability but were looking at 2 units that are 2 hundred and 50 sfooet e square feet and the other one thousand plus not assessable for anyone to rent i understand we have a challenge and major affordability problem but moving forward this particular development it might be weighing on her shoulders being the fact shes looking at building the user frantically in the richmond i would like you to balance out this citywide policy and start with a smaller developer so thank y
Interest balance becomes a little bit different than a demolition of town housing which quite frankly under 317 cant be grant so we need to look at that also and then the members of the board have talked about the fact you would like to have some kind of some of the units be affordable this is not going to be a rental project this is going to be a for sale project and what i suggest and i have to consult with the project sponsor is perhaps we can look at one of the unit as a for sale unit that is for the Workforce Housing that is right now we have two policies one is that 90 percent of medium income is section 13 and recently have a well, this last election the policy of having housing raising it up to one hundred and thirty percent i think one of the points this board has talked about although planning hadnt moved forward aggressively to address is the need for Workforce Housing also so one of my suggestions would be and again is the City Attorney has to jump into it whether or not it
Really affordable thank you. Next speaker. Hi, im amy lee im not not working on this project but speaking as a resident of the Richmond District im a single mom of 3 id love to have those size of rental apartment this is a city that is favorable unfriendly with one bedroom studios ive moved to the richmond and stuck in a house this is too expensive because theyre not unit like this available to families like myself i felt strongly but this project and feel for marching she is he is so developed previous projects that are skeptic to the community and i understand you guys have an important citywide policy with affordability but were looking at 2 units that are 2 hundred and 50 sfooet e square feet and the other one thousand plus not assessable for anyone to rent i understand we have a challenge and major affordability problem but moving forward this particular development it might be weighing on her shoulders being the fact shes looking at building the user frantically in the richmond i