receiving trial by jury, due process of the law. they ll have the right of appeal. i have no idea whether hunter biden will be convicted or acquitted. but i do know that he has two cases against him. the second of which, the tax one, starts on september the 5th, at the beginning of the general election, in california. biden could at any point have stopped this from happening. he s not, he s not interfering. there is no rigging coming from this president. where it s coming from is the supreme court. we re going to get them later this month, presumably later this month. they might prevaricate even longer. but later this month, finally coming down with their ruling on what should have been an open and shut case about whether the president has immunity for whatever he does in office. thereby ensuring trump will not be held accountable for january 6th in court, before november the 5th. that is that s the real story going on here.
donald trump. they are not fans of his miraculously and defying all possible statistics as well. this judge managed to get three anti-trump cases. steve bannon, allen weisselberg, the former cfo of the trump organization, and donald trump he donated this judge to the biden campaign his daughter raises money for the opposition for debbie asked you about the jury specifically should james i m not i m not done. you had a judge who told the jury that they did not have to be unanimous in their decision. they could come up with a whole host of different ideas and then they could come in and present it to him and they would work it out together. this this case from the beginning has been signed at the venue, should never have been in new york city because even though he had to be unanimous, people document leave trump, which again, about the jury and normal americans that are part of this. do you think it s not possible for any correct to get a fair trial by jury. i think that this judge
the jury specifically should james i m not i m not done. you had a judge who told the jury that they did not have to be unanimous in their decision they could come up with a whole host of different ideas and then they could come in and present it to him and they would work it out together. this case from the beginning has been cited. the venue should never have been in new york city because even though he had to be unanimous people document leave, trump, which and again, about the jury and normal americans that are part of this, do you think it s not possible for any correct to get a fair trial by jury. i think that this judge should have never been a presiding over this case. he weighed the entire case in the eyes of the jury, and then he gave the jury instructions that were incredibly leading. and you can t blame the jury they were doing what he told them to do. so from the beginning, this case, whether you re talking about the judge, the venue, the instructions given, or the f
lawyer. the constitution of the united states says we are a nation of laws, not of men. it allows for trial by jury, which is one of the most sacrosanct things in a democracy and it calls for the peaceful transition of power and as a result of yesterday we now know that donald trump tried to stop the election from being held in a free and fair way and after it was held he tried to stop the peaceful transition of power. you can t have two more graber assault on democracy and democracy cannot have a greater defendant then joe biden. the choice is clear you can have someone that cares about himself and his billionaire friends and seeks retribution and hate and wants to destroy the country or pick someone that wakes up every day fighting for the american people and who will save democracy if the american people give them a chance? national cochair for president joe biden s re- election campaign taper joining us this morning. we have a lot more on the guilty verdict, 34 counts, for form
powerful information, apart from the legal system. it s about an american focus group. and this is the way it works. michael beschloss, we ve been saying it s new york city and donald trump came out and set it only got 5% in manhattan, how can i get a fair trial here? also untrue as you pointed out. if you look at the makeup of the jury, which donald trump and his legal team had a say in selecting the jurors because that s how the system works. they struck and chose jurors. as many of the jurors, the 12th you see there, got their news from truth social, as msnbc, one each. a lot of them said fox news a wall street journal. the point being they consume news from a wide spectrum. they come from different backgrounds. some of them, perhaps, had some affection for donald trump. so they listened, as chris said, to the evidence and made