temperature studies. subsequent studies show a key step in his technique toerat generate a hockey stick even if random numbers are used. this was the case in the first seven panels of this chart. he used a mathematical technique that loaded all the weight of the final graph on these pines, and that s what really distorted the picture. in fact when the hockey stick is compared to another tree ring graph by the climatologist keith, the results converge sharply around 1960. it shows mann and jones struggling with what they should present to the public in the ippc report to account for the discrepancy. what are they going to do about the fact that keith s graph is going in the wrong direction and it detracts from the nice tidy story they want to tell. so in that case they chopped off theost post 1960 portion of briffa s graph. and they faced another problem like t that when they prepared a report for the world
leveled at his methodology. studies show a key step in his technique to generate a hockey stick even if random numbers are used. this was the case in the first seven panels of this chart. he used a mathematical technique that loaded all the weight of the final graph on these pines that discourted distorted the picture. sean: when the hockey stick is compared to another tree ring graph the results differed sharply starting in 1960. showing mann and jones struggling. what are they going to do about the fact that the graph is going in the wrong direction and detracts from the story. they choked off the post 1960 portion of briffa s graph. sean: jones faced the same problem reporting another report. he removed part of the data.
leveled at his methodology. studies show a key step in his technique to generate a hockey stick even if random numbers are used. this was the case in the first seven panels of this chart. he used a mathematical technique that loaded all the weight of the final graph on these pines that discourted distorted the picture. sean: when the hockey stick is compared to another tree ring graph the results differed sharply starting in 1960. showing mann and jones struggling. what are they going to do about the fact that the graph is going in the wrong direction and detracts from the story. they choked off the post 1960 portion of briffa s graph. sean: jones faced the same problem reporting another report. he removed part of the data.
sean: similar criticism leveled at his methodology. studies show a key step in his technique to generate a hockey stick even if random numbers are used. this was the case in the first seven panels of this chart. he used a mathematical technique that loaded all the weight of the final graph on these pines that discourted distorted the picture. sean: when the hockey stick is compared to another tree ring graph the results differed sharply starting in 1960. showing mann and jones struggling. what are they going to do about the fact that the graph is going in the wrong direction and detracts from the story. they choked off the post 1960 portion of briffa s graph. sean: jones faced the same problem reporting another report.
studies show a key step in his technique to generate a hockey stick even if random numbers are used. this was the case in the first seven panels of this chart. he used a mathematical technique that loaded all the weight of the final graph on these pines that discourted distorted the picture. sean: when the hockey stick is compared to another tree ring graph the results differed sharply starting in 1960. showing mann and jones struggling. what are they going to do about the fact that the graph is going in the wrong direction and detracts from the story. they choked off the post 1960 portion of briffa s graph. sean: jones faced the same problem reporting another report. he removed part of the data.