you have that we will find have to find a new president in the next weeks i think that the decision we did was the right decision now because you re a pest on any problems we have to face then we shouldn t talk for long about the process and complain we should now take the next challenge and for the next election we have to make sure that we do it better from the alliance record is positively stellar that of years. i mean the spanish for a minister the 2 confirmed foreign policy chief a man who was fined last year 30000 euros for insider trading of company shares in 2050 but is this really the best you could get. i mean in a package deal came you know that there is a package and there is a deal and there is not something that you can choose like this and like that oh please among 27 countries you couldn t find somebody who hadn t been convicted of any insider trading does not matter does not parking tickets but late him you have been voting about the brain as a present of the european
worried about getting iced out, japan is very much in the range of these midrange ballistic missiles. if those aren t addressed, japan feels very much that they will still be vulnerable. that nobody has more at stake in all of this than japan because of exactly what you just said. going back to the earlier thing, i think that everybody should probably be on the same page and absolutely want some kind of a congressionally approved treaty out of all of this. if we saw nothing else, we saw it with the gpl with the iran deal. the subsequent president can just rip it up if he wants to. if that had been an actual treaty, you wouldn t see that. i would have liked to have seen that go through the treaty process and i certainly hope this goes through the treaty process, as well as real, genuine, hard-core verifying and
he does it all the time doesn t he if. no. he doesn t. he doesn t say things for domestic consumption? if you re going through a treaty process and you have good fate i was right smack in the middle of it. you don t walk away and start firing bullets. i can t clooef believe an ad was doij that. not after you put a treaty or deal together. here is the part that s on train we strive to produce tariff barriers. it is to develop strong
north korea in bringing peace. i believe the letter is unfairly restrictive. why would you tell the president that you are going to limit his negotiation ability with the north koreans unless there s complete denuclearization? that s a more how hawkish positn than john bolton. i mean, we need to give the president some latitude and understand this may be a step by step process. elizabeth: would you still be vocal in supporting the fact that any type of treaty should be ratified when it comes to congress? i mean, we saw president obama make the iran deal really something that could have been, and it was, really dismantled with the stroke of the next administration. right. and i probably disagree with many of your viewers. i supported the iran deal, but i do think it would have been better if there was a treaty process. we learned this when woodrow wilson didn t get the league of nations ratified and didn t pay enough attention to the senate. i think things should come through congress
you re already fighting over tariffs on steel and aluminum. does that concern you at all? we want to have a strong relationship with our nato allies and european friends as well. the western democracy has kept peace and security throughout the world. we need to hang together. the fact of the matter is, though same countries, britain, france, germany, new full well when president obama entered this unilaterally, did not consult with congress, did not ratify this through the treaty process, that agreement was worth no more than the paper it was written on and they re recognizing that right now. hopefully french president macron is certainly talking about working out a better deal and that s the better attitude to take. paul: if such a deal did come to fruition, adding a couple of the provisions that you mentioned before, like the sunset provision and intrusive inspections, do you think you guys in the senate would be able and willing to put those provision intuse your legislation p