Proposal is well westbound the volume didnt include a penthouse and the vertical addition is setback 21 feet from the street and 15 from the existing building wall the department if feel that meet exceptional or extraordinary and not recommend you take dr pecks im available to answer any questions thank you. Great, thank you project sponsor. Im sorry, i apologize dr requester. My apologies. You have a 5 minute presentation. Thanks very much for hearing us i appreciate it i have 3 primary issues with this addition i wanted to show you overhead of the neighborhood and explain where we are i dont know if you can see that well, this is where we consider a key lot restricted on this right hand by the department of building inspection and the addition will block youll notice the front is over here and goes across this way the shadows reflective in the baked as opposed to this in the street it affects us in the back of the house we had all the open spaces so the proposed plan the extension of
Speakers ill call speakers please line up calling names okay first speaker please. Please. First speaker. In any order the 6 of you are in. Hello my name is owen i live on scott street zip codes im here to support in project and urge to certify the eir at ts as written this benefits the neighborhood and the city and it is much needed because we need a substantial increase in marketrate housing in San Francisco itges the use of Public Transportation because of its location and it also represents the Gold Standard in urban planning, i. E. , a large dense project at a transit stop please certify the eir and ultimately support in project thank you. Your mr. Odonnell, sir. Yes. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Mr. Tillman. Commissioners im bob tillman ive owned and operated a mission and opposed property since 2005 at the 25 and mission and im here to support the draft eir statement for 1979 mission as written id like to urge you to approve that statement and i think that if San Francisco c
Arrange for on overflow room and again, if youre occupying a seat for that item youll be sitting here for sometime okay. Id like to call roll at this time. Commissioner president fong commissioner Vice President richards commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and commissioner wu we expect commissioner johnson to be absence today commissioners, the first item on your agenda is our items proposed for continuance item o1 Market Street preliminaries negative declaration is proposed until march 16 and item 2 post street also known as as peace plaza suit 3 hundred conditional use authorization is proposed until march 2016 and item 3 at van ness conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance until march 17 and item 4 somerset street conditional use authorization has been withdrawn and finally item 5 Fourth Street avenue conditional use authorization it, too has been withdrawn i have no other items proposed for continuance and 3rd strei h speaker cards. Any Pub
Others. But you are doing a great job sitting here tonight. On that note, thank you for taking the time to come out tonight. [applause] would you be willing to stay and sign some books . We would be happy to sign. Thank you very much. Ben has written the most exciting stories of our times. From the founding of facebook to grow and mit card counting his books have taken the reader to different heights of wealth and power once upon a time in russia time in russia this is most extraordinary story yet the fall of the soviet Union Created immense financial opportunity in russia and the billionaire oligarchs that seized the opportunity changed the history. With corruption, cash cases in the car and car bombs, once upon a time in russia reads like a fastpaced fictional thriller but it is all the more impressive and important because its true. Ben mezrich is the number one best times selling author of 16 books including bringing down the house which was turned into the movie 21 in the accident
This is because we dont receive taxes from ucsf. And unfortunately we have a significant amount of work that we need to do, whether it be infrastructure at mission bay, whether it be Transportation Needs at mission bay, whether it be housing in mission bay and i do realize there are limits to where this funding can go. But i just think that they should be paying the entire amount up froth or paying the entire amount over the duration of the 30 years. I dont see why it should be discounted because the city is not collecting property taxes in any other instance from ucsf and in this particular case our one shot, our one chance at collecting some level of significant revenue is basically turned into a deal. I think they should pay the full amount and thats the reason why because there are no guarantees that theyll move out of the space. And the fact that thats even introduced in any way to make an argument is just i dont support that argument because we cant force them to do that. I think