Asking all these socalled rich people that, please, Pay Attention to those San Francisco an who contributed a lot to San Francisco but who just happen to be lowincome and no income. ~ san franciscans and im asking you representatives to give us three minutes to express ourselves because yall run your tongues and you know you can run your tongues because the tongue has no bone. Thank you very much. Thank you. Are there any other members of the public that wish to speak . ~ apart of this hearing . Please step up. Roberta [speaker not understood] ucsf, campus planning. I just want to submit for the record letters from the mission bay citizens advisory committee, nomad Mission Hiring Hall and [speaker not understood] services. Duly noted. Next speaker. Board of supervisors, [speaker not understood] open government. Just as i spoke earlier, it does offer an opportunity for consolidating 8 campus he and putting them in one location which in the end will provide reduction in parking problems.
This is because we dont receive taxes from ucsf. And unfortunately we have a significant amount of work that we need to do, whether it be infrastructure at mission bay, whether it be Transportation Needs at mission bay, whether it be housing in mission bay and i do realize there are limits to where this funding can go. But i just think that they should be paying the entire amount up froth or paying the entire amount over the duration of the 30 years. I dont see why it should be discounted because the city is not collecting property taxes in any other instance from ucsf and in this particular case our one shot, our one chance at collecting some level of significant revenue is basically turned into a deal. I think they should pay the full amount and thats the reason why because there are no guarantees that theyll move out of the space. And the fact that thats even introduced in any way to make an argument is just i dont support that argument because we cant force them to do that. I think
So, having said that, let me tell you the entire Mission Bay Area public trust line so all these Affordable Housing that you are talking that ucsf is talking about has to be put in perspective. Affordable is two rooms. [speaker not understood] when they say its affordable to talk more about lowincome and no income. So, what i hear you is a lot of baloney that, you know, we need Affordable Housing, but i bet you, its one of few representatives. You havent read the Housing Element. You havent read the Housing Element that reflects what the needs of our city the next 10 years. And you havent bothered to see whether the standards or the [speaker not understood] of the last Housing Element were provided. So, im asking ucsf and im asking all these socalled rich people that, please, Pay Attention to those San Francisco an who contributed a lot to San Francisco but who just happen to be lowincome and no income. ~ san franciscans and im asking you representatives to give us three minutes to exp
Approve these parcel maps would also be inadequate. Theyre kind of an ipso facto, if it didnt work there, it wont work here. Now, the Planning Department assumes this is a third issue that your time period after certification by the eir, the only issue is whether there is new information, changed circumstances, or a change in the project that would require a subsequent or supplemental eir. And i disagree with that. Even if its true, i think there is such new information and ill get to that. I do disagree with that. I think this board has an opportunity to reconsider the adequacy of this eir under ceqa at this time because this approval involves a vesting tentative map which could have been approval last summer with the other ones. For whatever reason the project sponsor decided to delay it. And a vesting map that grants fundamental rights to develop. So, this eir should be judged on its own merits at this time. Rather than simply looking through the lens as section 21 16 of ceqa looks
On item 22, supervisor yee . Aye. Yee aye. Supervisor avalos . Avalos aye. Supervisor breed . No. Breed no. Supervisor campos . Aye. He campos aye. Supervisor chiu . Chiu aye. Supervisor cohen . Cohen no. Supervisor farrell . Farrell aye. Supervisor kim . Kim aye. Supervisor mar . Mar aye. Supervisor tang . Tackv aye. ~ tang aye . Tang aye. Supervisor wiener . No. Supervisor wiener no. The item is a doddthv. [gavel] i think we need to call items 23 through 30. Item 23 is a public hearing of persons interested in the march 24, 2013 decision of public works approving a personal tent i have map for subdivision located 38 Mission Street. Item 24 is motion approving the decision of the department of public works and approving the tentative parcel map for a 4lot subdivision located at 738 Mission Street, assessors block no. 3706, lot no. 277; making environmental findings and findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1. Item