low-impact ways. so maybe there could be messages saying maybe it s time to take a break from your phone. i don t disagree with your assessment of the problem, but it makes me itchy when he start talking about another tax. i don t need another tax and i don t anymore warnings. i just, when we bring the lawn to it is what i have the problem. the last time we spoke about this issue and i said the biggest issue, we can t put the toothpaste back in the two. i think it boils down to what s happening in a family. in my family we use a lot of technology. we dinner together with no
and you have really two items that really involve this. one is the microtargeting of hillary clinton voters to suppress that vote. there s no question that that happened, and it happened with facebook and twitter. and that s the thing. nobody is going to put the toothpaste back in the bottle and say, you know, let hillary and bill move in tomorrow. acknowledge what happened and move forward. figure out how we can protect this country moving forward. exactly. the other thing that is astounding here is that the russians basically act as a boiler room for the trump campaign. whether they did it whitingly orca leo or colluding with the trump campaign. but after the information came out on the hollywood access tape, what did the russians do? they had wikileaks leak all of those e-mails that they stole from the dnc. yeah. i mean, that s what a legitimate campaign might do itself. here is the russian government acting. that s the distinction. nick, good to see you, as always. mi
low-impact ways. so maybe there could be messages saying maybe it s time to take a break from your phone. i don t disagree with your assessment of the problem, but it makes me itchy when he start talking about another tax. i don t need another tax and i don t anymore warnings. i just, when we bring the lawn to it is what i have the problem. the last time we spoke about this issue and i said the biggest issue, we can t put the toothpaste back in the two. i think it boils down to what s happening in a family. in my family we use a lot of technology. we dinner together with no
record, but i think that you are? yes. i think he s done a good job. i think the difference is, the difference is, they will know who sent them to washington and they will hear the voters and know what happened this cycle and will respond accordingly. the problem is, i think the republican populace in d.c., particularly in the senate, is expecting to be able to get away with just getting there and being there and not getting that much done. how much money are you willing to put behind some of these candidates that bannon is backing in the mid terms? i mean it depends case by case but how much do they need. really? i mean give me some numbers. are you willing to max out on how many candidates? i don t know, three, four, ten, i don t i think there s eight, seven or eight, potential republicans that bannon is looking at. do you think that for you, can they put sort of the tube back the toothpaste back in the tube. toothpaste back in the snub
complying with the deal because we know that they are not letting the iaea and military sites. we don t even really know if they are following along the deal examined these people are saying. i feel it is just a really tough decision for the president because of the fact that there are other countries involved. sandra: and because is being advised contrary to what he can campaigned on. yet, those closest to him, national security advisors, they are all saying stay in the spread chris: the bad parts of the deal already done. he will not put that toothpaste back in the tube. bipartisan spirit objected to with this deal, cash to iran, the opening of sanctions, that all happened. that is all done. that won t be undone. if you get out of the deal now, you lose the crack in the door that you had to get in. harris: the fact that you liken this to use toothpaste. we have to move on.