created, sometimes short term for the task at hand. tonight, we are led to leave it is messers mcgahn, bannon, and priebus who are on the talk him down team and it s the trump family caught up in the russia investigation themselves who are on the get rid of sessions team. my sense on the sessions issue is that everyone is sort of on the same page. i think it s pretty clear to them the impact that this would have. and that everyone sort of understands that. we ve seen so many different issues with this white house where indeed they do break down sort of on the republican line and line of folks from new york and people in the more democratic line. i think this one is pretty crystal clear. they re trying to avoid a situation like comey. if they could go back and put the toothpaste back in the comey jar, i don t think he would have fired comey because of what it has led to in the form of muler. jeremy, you alluded to this earlier but proof that this is no ordinary time.
where indeed they do break down sort of on the republican line and line of folks from new york and people in the more democratic line. i think this one is pretty crystal clear. they re trying to avoid a situation like comey. if they could go back and put the toothpaste back in the comey jar, i don t think he would have fired comey because of what it has led to in the form of muler. jeremy, you alluded to this earlier but proof that this is no ordinary time. chuck grassley, judiciary committee chairman tweeted tonight, we have it and we ll put it up on the screen. in kind of twitter shorthand. everybody in d.c. should be warned that the agenda for the judiciary committee is set for the rest of 2017. judges first, no punctuation, sub cabinet second/ag? no way. that is being taken as the senators way of saying don t you dare touch jeff sessions. exactly right.
steve: we have got a fox news alert. another terror attack foiled this time in brussels after authorities shot dead a would be suicide bomber. the attack the third in europe this week. and with the majority of terrorists apparently being radicalized online, the united kingdom wants to regulate chatter online r we doing enough to tackle that threat? a cyber terrorism analyst and senior fellow at the center for digital department. he joins us from washington. good morning to you. good morning, steve. steve: it is always hard to put the toothpaste back in the tube. the social media people have not patrolled what is put out there for so long now it s hard for them to do anything. steve, when they put, for example, facebook put out facebook live, could they not think that far ahead to think how could this be used? why don t we have these controls in place before we go
homeland security chief but he was frustrated there wasn t enough public awareness at the time. how that might have changed things, we don t know. he has no evidence that the vote totals were ever interfered with but the broader issue of sort of dealing with the thought process of the american voter is something he says he doesn t know the answer to how that was affected. ali velshi, if sean spicer is too uncomfortable to bring up the hacking incident to the president, if there was an actual collusion, is merely the president s bravado, he doesn t like his ego damaged? no one is trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube and say maybe you didn t win. if the idea let s get to agenda, you have to address these hacking allegations if 16 to 17 agencies say they tried to do this, guess what, they were successful and created chaos. you bring up an interesting
elect a president who then determines who his prosecutors are going to be, from the attorney general of the united states down to the u.s. attorney like me in new jersey. the people underneath you are typically career people. and i think that the fact of the matter is that the person who should be making the most sensitive decisions should be the person who is designated to do so by the president of the united states. i don t know what analysis attorney general sessions went through. i can t make a judgment. i don t know what the ethics lawyers at justice were telling h him. i don t know if he has personal counsel, what they were telling him. i don t know if there are other factors beyond what rt rowas red in the press. he didn t specifically say why. what i will tell you, my approach in general is to be reluctant to accuse. once you do, you can t put the toothpaste back in the tube. the oacomey asked to not be