bill: factor followup segmentt. there is the feeling across the usa as some americans simply will not accept the fact that donald trump is the president. berkeley, california, a clash saturday night between pro and anti-trump people. seven injuries, ten arrests. we expect that from berkeley. even more troubling is middlebury college in vermont. students and activists there shouted down a man named charles murray, who was invited to speak at the school. [chanting] bill: in the course of the demonstration, one professor was heard. hurt and had to go to the hospital. joining is from boston, mary anne marsh, from washington, katie pavlich. i expect this to get worse, don t you?
tapped trump tower. correct?t? that s right. he shouldn t have. on the other hand, i don t know exactly what proof he has. i think you have to cover this later on. you will cover later on tonight this whole issue, i thinku middlebury college, where this professor is under assault for inviting somebody. all of the stuff is growing because the left is going crazyu in response to donald trump winning. bill: all right. if the president doesn t have at least strong circumstantial evidence that trump tower was tapped, he should correct the record. because that one president lined up against another, almost unprecedented. you just proved it was tapped. bill, you proved yourself it was tapped. that is where general flynn was. bill: interesting point. that is where general flynn was. very interesting point. i knew there was a reason we had you on tonight.
following question, whether there were improper contacts between the trump campaign and russian officials? we did not include any evidence in our report, i say our report, that is nsa, fbi, and cia, with my office, the director of national intelligence, that had anything, any reflection of collusion between members of the trump campaign and the russians. there was no evidence of that included in our report. bill: that report was issued on january 6. also, a senator investigating the russian deal said the same thing. i know you have been briefed by fbi director comey and other members of the intelligence community. you have seen no evidence so far of collusion? o thus far, i have not. now, we are still in the relatively early stages and it will be thorough and wide-ranging, follow the facts wherever they take us. bill: senator cotton will be here tomorrow night. so any fair-minded person has to acknowledge that there is no evidence of collusion between
determining the course of action of each individual. is that good enough? i think that is the right step. when you look at everything middlebury did to prepare for this appearance, they did all the right things. they prepared the students, reminded them of the rules, participated in a high level, including the president. now, they are having an investigation. they have an honor code. bill: would you expel them if you were ms. patton, if found the students threatened the speakers and somebody hurt the professor, would you expel them? there is a range on the honor code, if you inhibit communication are people s ability to move freely, there is a range of punishments from fines to expulsion. i think it depends on what each individual did. they are going to be punished. bill: would you expel the worst offenders, katie? absolutely. i would also ask the police to press criminal charges for allegedly assaulting the professor and charles murray. if you look at the details of
gathered the information from that phone call, it would haveap nothing to do you would not be getting a fisa warrant on trump tower. bill: no, but you could not disseminate the information on flynn. it is against a lot to do that against the law to do that to an american citizen. okay, but the question of who tapped the phone, they don t have to have tapped flynn s phone. that is not correct. bill: we want to know who tapped it and why. we start from there. in addition, who leaked the information. that is perfectly legitimate. bill: we need to find out who tapped, then, you can go, like inspector clouseau, and find out who leaked. inspector clouseau is not a good inspector. bill: do you, austan goolsbee, want to know or not? yes or no? i would like to know unless it would violate national security for me to find out that it actually came from the ambassador. bill: oh, i see. my question to you, bill, is this. do you really want there to be congressional investig