i expect it to get worse because there haven t been a lot of consequences for the actions of the protesters, really, they are violent rioters. what we saw with mr. murray is completely unacceptable. not only did they shout him down at his speech, but they pulled the hair of one of thet professors who dared to show up with him on stage, severely injuring her neck. if you read his account of this, you can find at aei.org, you will find that it was a terrifying experience of getting pushed through a mob. they were trying to leave campus, and the mob was surrounding their vehicle, knocking down the windows. we have a choice. the administration has a choice. they can either punish the hundreds of students who engaged in the bad behavior or they can let it keep going on. the professors who also encourage the students should be in trouble, too. bill: absolutely. here, mary anne, a statement i got from laurie patton, the president of middlebury. it says, because of the complexity of act
and he said them very straightforwardly. he said this election is rigged. he said the polls are rigged. he said that the media is rigged. he said, for example, george bush, president of his own party, had deceived us, lied to us into the iraq war. it wasn t a mistake, it wasn t bad intelligence. he did it deliberately. now, if that is not shaking the foundations of the trust bill: you are saying that he is getting what he deserves? is that what you are saying?g? no, i am simply saying that history does not start january 20th bill: you have to start with the power structure. a campaign is different than a presidency. so, when this president wasta sworn in, certainly, you know, that the opposition said we are going to get him. we are going to get him. anyway we can get him, we are going to get him. that is a subversion that goes far beyond any campaign
is only applicable to information that is gathered outside of the united states.o, in absolutely no way does it have anything to do with trump tower.ni bill: we are talking about a conversation with a russian ambassador that is being widely speculated upon. we are talking about a new information, okay, inside the government, that was allowed by president obama and loretta lynch which only apply to foreign gathered intelligence. bill: russia as a foreign country. if you collect the intelligence of the united states, even if you a collected about russia, that does not apply, bill. that is just total speculation. bill: nobody is saying thaty, the laws were upheld. what we are saying is that there were two things that happened and both of them are absolutely in stone. now, we have to find out
the trump campaign and russia, at least at this point. correct? now, on to the tapping. in order for that to legally happen, a judge would have to issue a fisa warrant. if the fbi, for instance, had a fisa court order for surveillance, with that the information you would know? yes. you would be told this? if there was a fisa court order or something like this? yes, something like this, absolutely. you can t confirm or deny whether that exists? i can deny it. bill: that is pretty definitive. president trump has asked for an investigation into the alleged tapping. f we assume that will happen but this whole thing is terrible for the country.ed america s credibility is being damaged all over the world. t the federal government s ability to even operate is being impeded. so, for the good of the country, perhaps we should tamp down to
there was, we are going to gettr him and it is going to be nonstop. that is exactly what we are seeing. i think that s true. but i think it s wrong to begin history with the resistance to the trump presidency. look at what happened when barack obama was elected and who led the movement to discredit his presidency, to say he was illegitimate, to say he should never be in the white house, because he was not born in hawaii, but in kenya, but donald trump. bill: you can t compare the two because there was no backing for that.. that was a fringe play. now, you can chastise mr. trump for buying into that, certainly valid. there wasn t a mass press, tried to get obama, there wasn t leaks, there weren t leaks. leaks from very high placed people, trying to destroyak president obama. that is happening now. when trump ran for the presidency, he said many things