Davos forum friday morning. Pres. Trump thank you very much. It is a great honor to be with Prime Minister may. We had a great discussion. We are on the same wavelength. The Prime Minister and myself have had a really great relationship, although some people dont necessarily believe that. But i can tell you, its true. I have a tremendous respect for the Prime Minister and the job shes doing. Pres. Trump i think the feeling is mutual from the standpoint of liking each other a lot. There is a false rumor out there. I wanted to correct it frankly because i have Great Respect for everything youre doing. We love your country. I think it is really great. We are working on our transactions in terms of economic development, trade, maybe most importantly, military. We are very much joined at the hip when it comes to military. We have the same ideas, the same ideals. And theres nothing that would happen to you that we wont be there to fight for you. You know that. And i just want to thank you ve
U. S. Conference of mayors. We are so excited that everybody is here. Thank you all for joining us this morning. Let me thank my cohosts from anaheim and from providence. This is a threeperson show that we have done for a couple of years. I want to welcome you on behalf of the latino alliance. And also you will hear from these gentlemen who have done an extraordinary job leading our immigration platform at the u. S. Conference of mayors. I want to thank each of the mayors and staff here for really showing that immigration and issues of importance to the latino community, larger than just immigration because we care about education and Economic Development and other things, that in your cities where there are large populations of latinos , that there is a great bipartisan consensus on an agenda to move forward. We will be talking about some of our defensive measures today, but i wanted to say that it is important for all of us to stay proactive and make sure that while we are doing what
All right. Good evening, everyone. Thank you for coming. Welcome. I my name is Amanda Woodword and im the dean of the division of social sciences here at the university of chicago. Im just delighted to be here with this group of faculty for this event. This evening is continuing a yearlong series of events at the university of chicago commemorating the 75th anniversary of the first controlled selfsustaining Nuclear Chain reaction which happened just over there. Over the past five months, there have been events across campus xh commemorating the breakthrough and exploring the experiments long term impact, and the events have presented u opportunities to engage scientists, artists and policy makers and the public around a set of events that grew from that original event 75 years ago. This evenings discussion im particularly delighted because it brings in social science in just the way it should be. Our panelists will be introduced in a moment. Each is a scholar and International Relation
We also invite your participation via twitter using hashtag pmq. Members are finishing up other business. Now live to the floor of the british house of commons. At the j mcn on 16th october. These facilitated official engagement and expect significant progress in the coming months including publishing our analysis. The secretary of state, any indication about how they use the power they will be receiving . As i said in response to a previous question we have nothing about how they intend to use the powers that will be available after we leave the eu. Lets have a debate about using powers for the benefits, not about process. Number 12, i have not had discussions about car Parking Charges or the area of the vault confidence. The vast majority do not chart the course and initiate discussions for health and social care for specific sentencing to england. I am sure my colleague, secretary of state for health and social care and my honorable friend coming. Questions to the Prime Minister . S
Innocence, and insists on testing the prosecution on its burden of proof, the constitution prohibits a trial court from permitting the defendants own lawyer over the defendants objection to tell the jury that he is guilty. The sixth amendment guarantees a personal defense that belongs to the accused and whether to admit or contest guilt is the par rod eggmatic example, it singularly affects the life and liberty of the accused, but also because making that decision requires weighing subjective aspirations and value judgments that are unique to every individual. Suppose the charge is murder, and the lawyer says, based on what ive looked, i think your best case is selfdefense, you know, and the other guys, the defendant says, no, i didnt shoot the person. And the lawyer says, well, i think the evidence is going to show that you did, selfdefense. If the lawyer goes ahead and presents that defense, does that fall under your theory . Mr. Chief justice, i think your question raises a question