From the first gop debate with donald trump versus the rest of the party. Check out this brand new cnn orc pol poll out this morning showing trump in first place among republicans with 18 support, jeb bush following with 15 . Well so much for the predictions made here on this program and everywhere else last weekend that trumps kban would implode after he insulted john mccain. It seems like hes doing better than ever. The new poll also shows trump is the gops most wanted the candidate voters most want to see at the debate. He is guaranteed a spot on the stage. But what about the rest of the pack . Fox news is holding the debate on august 6th and fogs is only going to invite the top ten candidates top ten in the polls. That means six will not make the cut. Its decision thats angered a lot of people including some of the candidates. They say fox is basically hoeing its own primary whittling down the field of candidates. Fox says it has no choice. Cnn is doing similar for its debate in se
Mexico
New-york
United-states
New-hampshire
Madrid
Spain
Iowa
Fort-green
Florida
Taiwan
Jersey
Washington
executive editor who resigned on principle in this matter the difference between him and me, for tommy and some of the more hard line editorial staff, truth itself is the only necessary defense, and the belief is that nothing should ever be taken down if it is true. as i said in that quote, i believe that it s not it s necessary for something more than just simply truth to be operative in a story and truth and the interests, interest to our peers, to our audience is essential. would you publish that tape now, now that it seems like gawker is changing its editorial philosophy? the hogan story is an entirely different story. the hogan story, this is a story about a public figure massive global celebrity who talks incessantly about his sex life. we learned he was fired by the wwe, that helps your case. it shows motivation that
Staff
Matter
Principle
Difference
Tony-craggs
Truth
Editorial
Defense
Line
Belief
Something
Nothing
i am the guardian of the editorial ethos of the company. this is counter to what i want us to be doing. therefore, i had it taken down. gawker sort of has this reputation as being a place where anything goes. if it s true you publish it. here is part of the interview about hulk hogan. knowing what you know now, knowing all the legal costs already, would you have still published the video? i m glad the decisions that taken on publishing taken at the time and i m glad that we only really look at whether the story is both true and interesting. this story was true and interesting and we d absolutely publish it again in a heartbeat. this was a sex tape involving hulk hogan, now he s suing. we can get into the lawsuit. what you said is what we look at is whether the story is true and interesting. is that still true? i think the difference between tony craggs the
Gawker
Company
Sort
Anything
Place
Reputation
Editorial-ethos
Guardian
Part
Interview
Hulk-hogan
Decisions