i am the guardian of the editorial ethos of the company. this is counter to what i want us to be doing. therefore, i had it taken down. >> gawker sort of has this reputation as being a place where anything goes. if it's true you publish it. here is part of the interview about hulk hogan. >> knowing what you know now, knowing all the legal costs already, would you have still published the video? >> i'm glad the decisions that taken on publishing taken at the time and i'm glad that we only really look at whether the story is both true and interesting. this story was true and interesting and we'd absolutely publish it again in a heartbeat. >> this was a sex tape involving hulk hogan, now he's suing. we can get into the lawsuit. what you said is what we look at is whether the story is true and interesting. is that still true? >> i think the difference between tony craggs the