humanity who are appalled by those who killed him. the united states of america will continue to do what we must do to protect our people. we will be vigilant, and we will be relentless. when people harm americans anywhere, we do what s necessary to see that justice is done. so just take that and compare it to iri riveting thing about trump s report last night is he acted out the body slam. it s not a matter of being a republican or democrat. it s about being a person who is charged with protecting the american people, protecting our values and norms. and here he is encouraging two-bit thuggery, not only around the world but here at home. and i think you re right, matt. it s not only a tone deafness but a complete failure of leadership. he does not understand what his role is. and i ve got to say, i m a little surprised today i haven t heard more from the democrats.
here to discuss the day s developments, from the new york times, mike schmidt, matt miller, former chief spokesman at the justice department, jennifer rubin, washington post opinion writer and doug thornell, former senior adviser to the dnc. matt miller, there s such fatigue to all of the obliterating of norms and niceties and customs, but there s a tone deafness to this one. this isn t just a story about the obliteration of norms and what presidents normally do when a journalist is murdered abroad. this is about being oblivious to the moment in which his white house finds itself. his white house right now is fielding questions about what our intelligence agencies had collected about the saudis plan to detain jamal khashoggi and the president has a shifting story at the moment about his views on all of that. it s a despicable thing for a president of the united states to say at any time it s an especially despicable thing for him to say at this time.
there is bigger fish to fry for native people. right. we have thousands of native voters being disenfranchised in realtime with the blessing of the supreme court in north dakota. we have native children being separated from their families in texas according to the federal court there. but this is something that is just another example of white tone deafness to native concerns and native voices. sabrina, so i heard that from folks today. i saw republicans saying basically moving the goalposts. there is sort of this real question about there is a different question here how do you deal with donald trump running around saying something vile, right? that s the fundamental issue. he runs around saying pocahantas, poke hanlts, pocahantas, what do you do when you want to run for president? absolutely. this is very much similar to when he continued to push conspiracies around president obama s birthplace and ultimately that led to the release of president obama s birth certificate.
playing on my field now. and i think that, because, at 6:00 tonight, after when the story was sort of rolling, she tweeted out a tweet that essentially said, okay, now i have a family story for. you let me tell you about this multigenerational criminal conspiracy. right. which was clearly the sort of what she was working up to. but there is so much going on here. jossi, i wanted to talk to you. i was reading a lot of different native writers and thinkers about this today. the cherokee nation came out with this saying look, there are tribal identities and tribal procedures for determining that identity that are not dna, and there was a lot of, as far as i can tell, anger and lack of enthusiasm among the native writers i was reading today. what do you think of happen had today? there is definitely a level of anger. there is definitely a level of tone deafness to elizabeth warren s statement, this spectacle that she chose to unveil. honestly, both donald trump and
but there is so much going on here. jossi, i wanted to talk to you. i was reading a lot of different native writers and thinkers about this today. the cherokee nation came out with this saying look, there are tribal identities and tribal procedures for determining that identity that are not dna, and there was a lot of, as far as i can tell, anger and lack of enthusiasm among the native writers i was reading today. what do you think of happen had today? there is definitely a level of anger. there is definitely a level of tone deafness to elizabeth warren s statement, this spectacle that she chose to unveil. honestly, both donald trump and elizabeth warren should give that million to the national indigenous women s research center for both of them making indigenous ancestry into a campaign prop. and i think that s what most people have a level of consternation about. now, to be honest and to be straight forward, of course