about that. why is he seemingly defending mr. porter publicly? is it because he has faced his own situations? the president and the entire administration take domestic violence very seriously and believe all allegations need to be investigated thoroughly. is there a tone deafness? just being on the wrong side of things? i don t think the president being on, supporting due process for any allegation is not tone deaf. i think it is allowing things to be investigated and a mere allegation not being the determining factor. he is not taking a side one way or the other. the president s comments prompted one of the accusers. to write the continued dismissal of me and colbie, my truth has
wants success for all americans. that he was elected to serve all americans and he hopes for the best for all american citizens across the country. jim? what about the president s tweet over the weekend, people s lives are being shattered or destroyed by mere allegation. it seems like the president was believing mr. porter as opposed to his alleged victims. why did the president tweet that over the weekend? why is he seemingly defending mr. porter publicly? because he has faced his own allegations? is there some sensitivity there? as i just said, and i ll repeat it. the president and the entire administration take domestic violence very seriously and believe all allegations need to be investigated thoroughly. he certainly supports the victims of domestic violence above all else and believes everyone should be treated fairly and with due process. the president is simply saying there should be a due process, that should be followed and looked at. is there a tone deafness
publicly the president sounds like he s defending porter tweeting over the weekend, people s lives are being shattered. some are true and some are false. some are cold and some are new. there s no recovery for someone the accused. is there no such thing as due process? that after he all but stood up to a reporter friday. he said very strongly that he s innocent. you ll have to talk to him about that. we absolutely wish him well. he did a very good job while he was at the white house. why is he seemingly defend plg porter publicly? because he has faced his own allegations? is there some sensitivity there? as i just said, and i ll repeat it. the president and the entire administration take this seriously. is there a tone deafness? is there just a, being on the wrong side of things? i don t think the president being on the, support dugard
best. jim? what about the president s tweet over the weekend, people s lives are being shattered and destroyed by allegations. it seems like the president was believing mr. porter as opposed to his alleged victims. why did the president tweet that over the weekend, why is he seemingly defending mr. porter publicly? is because he faced his own allegations? is there sensitivity there? i just said and i ll repeat it again, the president and the entire administration take domestic violence very seriously and believe all allegations need to be investigated thoroughly. he certainly supports the victims above all else and believes that everyone should be treated fairly and with due process. the president is saying that there should be a due process that should be followed and looked at. there s a tone deafness there. being on the wrong side of things. i don t think the president
tone deafness away about abused women, you re still left with mismanagement. that s the strongest case against kelly but it s also what the message is to the world. kellyanne conway said over the weekend that privately the president has given aid and supported many women. it doesn t matter what the president has done privately. he s a public figure. couldn t one argue the 130 grand check cut to stormy daniels would be considered private support? it s what you put out to the world what you re comfortable with. i want to share what mick mulvaney said. based on a lot of our reporting, mulvaney is a guy who wouldn t mind taking john kelly s job. someone we know and trust came to the chief of staff and said look, i m being accused of these things, they are not true. for the president, the chief of staff, to give that person the benefit of the doubt is probably a very normal and human reaction. as soon as rob porter was proven wrong, proven he was not telling