Speakers talk about attempts in florida to purge voter rolls of suspected noncitizens. On federal Court Rulings voter laws and the prospects for a unified National Registration system. Heres a look at the event. They put this in a little bit of context as to why people can come to very different conclusions on the same topic. Republicans generally have a view of the purpose of an election, which a certainty. The purpose of holding an election is that we know will one and we are clear as who at one and there is no question. Clings up theat electoral process, that gives up that certainty, is a burden worth paying, because that is the purpose of an election. Thatrats generally believe it involves participation. That anything limits the participation of all those who could vote from voting undermines the legitimacy of the outcome, even if that means that the results may be a little messy on the edges. These are both legitimate decisions. This is a perspective towards the purpose of the ele
Are bearers and there are writers. Must acknowledge that each of us has both a role and value to contribute to the society to the people in dubuque, iowa, are praying that we demonstrate today. Eu, afteri apologize these two great speakers that this is what you get for sitting in the back of the class. I have great hope in the millennials. Signsare buildings with that said no blacks, no puerto ricans, no dogs. This current generation, i have a 20yearold and a 12yearold. Maybe in urban areas like ours where they grew up with diversity, particularly public education, kids like mine who are puerto rican, cuban, jewish, russian what are they . They embrace diversity and ways. They dont tolerate it. They are race at. Tolerance is a horrible word. I tolerate pain. We use that term a lot. That has probably been a right word to use. Diversity, maybe. I think newer generations embrace it. Its all they know. Thats why a lot of young people coming back to south florida because they like it. Im ho
The weapons. It became lucky. Obama issued a redline challenge. They brokered a deal in which syria gave up chemical weapons. They can still use chlorine gas and other things not classified officially as weapons. They are terrible and brutal. The Syrian Civil War led to serious not having chemical weapons. Ub. It makes the regime more tolerable from an israeli point of view. As for the alternative, there is a phrase going around they are at the fence. Israel holds most of the golan heights. Rebels have taken an area known by. Someone who might be the Free Syrian Army. The israelis watched this. They are at the fence. The response has been, in secret. Try to make contact with everybody. Try to be as friendly as we can. You heard about the hospital northern israel . Which is a good part of publicity . They are treating wounded people from the Syrian Civil War . Is that an intelligence bonanza opportunity to interview people and send them back in. Treat only your favorite people. Treat so
Republicans, 202 5853881. Parties, 202 5853882. You can catch up with us on your favorite social media pages. If you chose your Political Party by a specific issue, a poll shows what party you may belong to. Most dominant issues for republican voters. Only about half of democratic voters say these issues are important to their decision. The chart can be found at the Pew Research Center for the people and the press. Budget deficit, forum policy, immigration, terrorism, and economy. For those issues more important to those voting democrat, environment, economic inequality, birth control, and health care. Aboutally a port equally important, abortion and gay marriage. If your parents have influenced your decision to vote, a story from earlier this year two children take their parents political beliefs . It is not that simple. Parents with strong beliefs feel it is their duty to see their children adopt those beliefs, however wellmeaning those efforts are, they may be in vain. Found that pa
Matters. If those three things factor in, are there those. Here on the phone lines 2025853881 for republicans, 2025853880 for democrats agend r independents, 2025853882. If you want to make your thoughts known by computer on do so as well. Roof us on twitter. Send an email to a journal at cspan. Org with the upcoming e leningsz, more stories about what people think and political people think about the future of the senate. I did highlighted in the New York Times this morning. Take a look at kansas. It says the probability forecast models fluctuate from week to week. They are based upon different methodologies. The Huffington Post forecast gave republicans a 54 chance of winning control of the senate. The New York Times model says 66 . The warrant post election lab prediction was 95 . The Election Consortium gave democrats a 49 of maintaining control. This highlights the current rates between pat roberts and greg orr saying here in kansas, the independent greg orman has certain the lead