You can look at the trees behind me. The limb was massive. Obviously, this is not the ending that any of us were praying for. They heard a crack. My brother screamed. He saw her under the tree. Mary it happened in a heart beak. The 6yearold rushed outside with her father to shove the driveway. She was running out. Oh, daddy, lets make a snowman. Then the next thing i know, a tree broke. Mary. The limb gave way, crashing down, pinning her. That happened, fell right here. She was about right like that area. Mary they worked to lift the massive branch. The neighbors called for an ambulance. Had pulse by the time they came. She didnt when they were first hit. The neighbors helped, thanked two. Mary cailey was transported to boston but shortly before 7 00 p. M. , the little girl with a sweet demeanor died of her injuries. Lauding the valiant efforts to save the kindergarten and warning other par ent ares to keep the kids away are the trees until the heavy snow melts. You wouldnt think, you
And hope it is not a hook. It is meant to be nice. I am enormously impressed. Two points. Your operators dont like lawyers. I used to be part of the aba and the most impressive members were the generals and the world doesnt know it. The world thinks of the United States as a colossus, a bit of a road. Any idea how long bound we are . Maybe we should be talking about that. I tried to take opportunities to speak at places and to share. We care passionately about the law. We care passionately about doing the right thing. I dont see a lot of lawyers saying get away from something wrong. It is not what we do. Our job is to say to the commander, you cant do this but here is another way to do it that is legal, ethical and moral. We are not ethical and moral, advisers in a sense but we have that perspective. My title is legal counsel. I think i have a role to play in giving legal advice but also as a counselor so i take that seriously and i have been blessed with clients, general Stanley Mcchr
Energy the energy issues. But i went on because of the Health Policy. And on that committee, Health Policy was not just medicare, or medicaid, but also Public Health, and Environmental Issues that affect health. So one of the areas that i quickly became involved in, for decades, was the Clean Air Act, because the Clean Air Act and the Safe Drinking Water law and other such environmental laws related to Public Health. And you spent i mean, you describe this as being a constituent issue for medicare, and elderly constituents. But you also spent a whole lot of your time working on behalf of low income people, poor people, who probably really arent a big constituency, certainly not now that you represent beverly hills. But you spent a lot of your time and trouble with Medicaid Expansions, with child Health Insurance, with trying to get poor Pregnant Women Health care. How did you decide that you needed to work on Poverty Issues . If you can think of it as a constituent issue. I have always
Viewers and cspan. Welcome to the candidates for governor. The five people who gathered 10,000 certified signatures to qualify for the november 4th ballot. They are, the republican nominee, charlie baker, a former State Government official. The democratic nominee, martha cokely, attorney general of the commonwealth since 2007. United independent party nominee, falchuk. And scott lively, a missionary pastor. And independent jeff mccormick, a venture capitalist. Candidates, welcome to you all. Thank you. Before we begin, a quick word about our format. Ill be asking questions, some of which were submitted by citizens to cbs boston. Com. Each candidate will have up to 45 seconds to respond to the same questions, so you can compare their answers. After theyve had their initial say, we will enter open periods of rebuttal and crosstalk where candidates can question one another and engage directly. There are only three strict rules. No talking over each other, no filibustering, and total utter
226th anniversary of the u. S. Constitution and i am reminded of vindication on the 200th anniversary, when the nation magazine asked novelist el doctorow to read the constitution from start to finish in right of his reactions. Didnt enjoy the assignment. Is 5000 words long, but reads like 50,000 he said. Alexei erdrich and shows not a trace of wit. He uses none of the troops of literature to create an pathetic state of mind of the reader. Those of you whove read the work now that he is one of our finest writers and understands American History very well. But this occasion i think you missed the story. For one thing, he missed a third of the constitution, which is 7500 words long. Apparently he quit when he got to the end of the original power. Under the common american misconception that the amendments dont count. Even reading the 1787 document, kia i think missed some truly high rhetoric, some literary trope and may be no wait, but a certain amount of irony. Like at doctorow, america