tom hardman and neil gosh sursu were coming to the white house. they would answer the summons because if either is nominated today, they would like to be considered for the next possibly vacancy on the supreme court. so they would natural come. but we don t know how it s going to unfold. it s unusual because now with less than an hour 45 minutes. i cannot think with aull the current justice on the court, 45 minutes before the announcement this is undoubtly because of members of the ju message within the white house, whether this is just all
record. if we remember accuse of bias because of the heritage, that has not been his track record to color within the line. it would not surprise if he over steps the bound on there tonight. but to me, it sounds like episode of the bachelor. let me go back to tom. it seems to me it s gotten bitter and almost a joke. last year of the presidency of barack obama. they would not meet with him or vote on him. they wouldn t see him. they said it s some principle. which is where not going to let you do anything. now, there s a lot of back
president president obama. executive seen the other is thomas hardman u.s. court of appeal for the third scircuit i pennsylvania. the guessing game is within the hour when he announce his pick. tom, and let me start with mr. goldstein. and this ger sten. why are we have misuniverse competitor, kind of event. what does this do for the respectability of the appointee? it s unfortunate fort the
give us the big three names and who are they. okay, paul. the big three names are neil gore such, 11th circuit paul: william pryor finish. thank you. [laughter] and 3rd sir tut, tom hardman. these are all three extremely good judges and it really is a reflection, you know, trump launched off with this list of 21 at the beginning. i think it was a huge success for him. it was a situation where, you know, a lot of keys were looking conservatives were looking for something very reassuring during the campaign, and exit polls actually showed one in five conservatives said the supreme court was their number onish or shoe for voting. so i think he has a list of really good names. these are all winners. paul: and that s one of the reasons he s likely to pick somebody from the list even if he goes off of these three, because he views it as a political success for him. right, for sure. and, you know, i think of these three they re all solid conservatives, we know they re all tex callis
this latest gunman that was obviously mentally ill. it s better coordination in mental health and regular physicians. yes, it s all good news. stephanie: oh, dear. counter to what the republicans would tell you. stephanie: oh, dear we will talk about that latest wrinkle in a health care corner. and now here she is jacki schechner. good morning, everybody. the senate is going to vote today on whether or not to move forward with comprehensive immigration reform. the compromise is up for discussion and carves out a 13-year path towards silt sinship for the 11 million or so undocumented immigrants living in the united states. even though some republicans have serious problems with the proposaled law, most have indicated at least a willingness to let the motion move forward. meaning it should get the 60 yes votes it needs to continue. some conservatives say the past to citizenship constitutional ought tos amnesty. when the bill gets out of the senate, it is going to matt