Situation is but the iranians are naturally going to threaten more. I mean, that is clearly, you know, The Point is The Point of deterrence is to say if you do this we will strike back. The israelis have done the same to the iranians. It is very likely now that the israelis will want to be sure they punch back and punch back quite hard. They punch back and punch back quite hard quite hard. Thank you indeed for bein quite hard. Thank you indeed for being with quite hard. Thank you indeed for being with us. 0ur our next guest, the same questions to you if i can. We are seeing both sides warning against further action and both sides saying there will be a Response if so, what would you expect to see from israel and if israel does strike, what is the risk in terms of an iranian retaliation for that . The risk in terms of an iranian retaliation for that . Thank you for having retaliation for that . Thank you for having me. Retaliation for that . Thank you for having me. This retaliation for
perpetrators accountable and together with our allies and partners we ll rachet up the pain for putin and further increase russia s economic isolation. the war in ukraine is topic number one for nato officials in brussels. nic robertson is there. what is the message? i imagine, do more. reporter: do more, do it fast, do it now. they need it now. we know secretary of state antony blinken said he came to speak with the nato foreign ministers to collaborate, to consult, but one of the other things and the tough thing that they need to do is to find consensus among all nato members on precisely how they can answer nato ukraine s message for help and that message was delivered very, very clearly today by ukraine s foreign minister. my agenda is very simple. it has only three items in it. it s weapons, weapons and
investigate conflicts of interesting, as they put it in this letter, and decisions made and not made by current and former d.o.j. officials in 2016 and 2017. i want to play this from gowdy earlier responding to whether or not he ll hear back on this. let s listen first. when folks on your own side are saying you need to look at this i think jeff sessions will take their perspective seriously and will communicate to chairman goodlatte at some point. whether or not he is going to do it he doesn t own us an answer legally. practically it would be wise to consult. sandra: they put together the letter last night. brad. the department is incapable of investigating itself. i.g. doesn t have the authority to investigate beyond its department and a lot of people have left who are material witnesses to what the practice of bias that was endemic within
something, when chuck grassley calls for something and lindsey graham, all of whom are fans of the department of justice, when folks on your own side are saying you need to look at this, i think jeff sessions will take their perspective seriously and communicate to chairman goodlatte at some point. practically, it d be wise to consult. bill: in a moment i ll talk with the white house press secretary sarah sanders at 9:45 eastern time. sandra, as you can imagine, the list is long for topics for sarah sanders. we ll have that in about 30 minutes. sandra: a lot happening in that building behind you. more coming up, we re following for you the justice department is officially suing the state of california for it s illegal sanctuary city policy. can the lawsuit produce real
an important force on the trump team. and as long as that exists there is always going to be a conflict of interest looming over the white house every step of the way on every policy decision. and it comes down to donald trump either getting a fully independent third party to run his businesses or selling them off. the other question is about ownership of the properties. does donald trump continue to own them? he says he s going to continue to remove himself from day to day business operations but not the ownership itself. is that enough? i think it is enough. american people elected him knowing he had a $10 billion brand. elected him and knowing it was a complex structure. and knowing the children were advisors. were going to take over the company. that was always said. my kids are going to take over. it is unprecedented and we ve never seen anything like it before and that is why the onus is on donald trump to consult