angry at members of congress for not standing up to him. he s angry at everyone else. and we won t eve show it it because it s not germane. but tweeting about had nfl mocking the salary of the nfl commissioner. so let s tie that in. what they see their boss doing and the vacancies to the remaining employee morale. well, it s incredibly difficult for people working hin white house coming out of the helsinki debacle. they re having a hard time figuring out how do we capture the conversation again? the it president has his own ideas on how to do hat. he wants to go back to talking about cultural issueses like the nfl kneeling. he also wants to talk about federal interest rates. it s extraordinary that this weekall so the president went
from kim himself hand delivered by the north korean former spy chief friday. here is former house speaker newt grateful we are talking rather than getting ready to go to war and i think it president wants it to work if it possibly can. arthel: molly, what can you tell us? it s back on. but don t expect it to be smooth sailing according to james mattis. he was in singapore preparing for the june 12 meeting. here is more from trump administration officials on that upcoming nuclear weapons summit.
campaign, wikileaks along with several associates of it president. they re alleging a far reaching conspiracy to disrupt the 2016 campaign and sway donald trump. keith, do you think this is smart move? i do. the democratic party it feels like first of all, clinton won more votes than trump did. the democrats are upset about trump the way he s governing and they feel the party isn t doing anything. and this is way the party can be more aggressive and there s a precedent for this. don t you think it makes it seem even more political? it is political. i get that but in 1972 there was a precedent for this win, the democratic party sued the nixon campaign because they cheated to win the election. donald trump basically cheated to win this election. that s what they believe, he
the democrats have filed a suit against russia, the trump campaign, wikileaks along with several associates of it president. they re alleging a far reaching conspiracy to disrupt the 2016 campaign and sway donald trump. keith, do you think this is smart move? i do. the democratic party if feels like first of all, hikts won more votes than trump did. the democrats are upset about trump the way he s governing and they feel the party isn t doing anything. and this is way the party can be more aggressive and there s a precedent for this. don t you think it makes it seem even more political? it is political. i get that but in 1972 there was a precedent for this win, the democratic party sued the nixon campaign because they cheated to win the election.
they know the arbitrator who is assigned is going to do something. the arbitration conversation is really about disagreement whereas i think her lawyer is making this a much bigger conversation. it s not just this question of did was it signed about it president, it is also the question of has michael koen by making the statements said things that have nulified the agreement? it s really a lot broader. i think he s right to and i think anderson knows this, but my guess is that there is documentary evidence that they don t want out. otherwise, they would not be fighting this. that s part of the agreement too. right. yeah. how likely the president attached himself on to this case when it switched to federal court. why would he do that if according to michael kohn this has nothing to do with the president? there is a new lawyer. he is very skilled. knows what he is dealing with. he knows what the field requires of him and there is no way they re going to get any action i