yeah. there s that. there s that. i mean, there s we know that he s saying manafort did not fully cooperate and we re going to have filings about that. but it really is the fact that there are investigations that are criminal in nature and that are redacted in documents that have been filed before the court and we also know that he s fighting about documents and evidence from company a, which is controlled by a foreign government that is fighting him on delivering those documents. you have about 60 seconds remaining. if you switch teams and the president hired you and said, look, there s stuff in this mueller stuff i don t want out, how tough an argument is it to make executive privilege arguments? it s ridiculously tough. what i wouldthanks, i have a job. you can t hide behind an attorney, slink behind counsel to avoid scandal. the reality here is that we have the richard nixon case in which richard nixon said executive
sentenced before march. he s got to do an update on that. but we know that there are investigations even in the reporting over the last month, we ve seen new indications that of contact between paul manafort and, of course, a former russian arms dealer. yeah. there s that. there s that. i mean, there s we know that he s saying manafort did not fully cooperate and we re going to have filings about that. but it really is the fact that there are investigations that are criminal in nature and that are redacted in documents that have been filed before the court and we also know that he s fighting about documents and evidence from company a, which is controlled by a foreign government that is fighting him on delivering those documents. you have about 60 seconds remaining. if you switch teams and the president hired you and said, look, there s stuff in this mueller stuff i don t want out, how tough an argument is it to make executive privilege
they know the arbitrator who is assigned is going to do something. the arbitration conversation is really about disagreement whereas i think her lawyer is making this a much bigger conversation. it s not just this question of did was it signed about it president, it is also the question of has michael koen by making the statements said things that have nulified the agreement? it s really a lot broader. i think he s right to and i think anderson knows this, but my guess is that there is documentary evidence that they don t want out. otherwise, they would not be fighting this. that s part of the agreement too. right. yeah. how likely the president attached himself on to this case when it switched to federal court. why would he do that if according to michael kohn this has nothing to do with the president? there is a new lawyer. he is very skilled. knows what he is dealing with. he knows what the field requires of him and there is no way they re going to get any action i
order, who was assigned by adr. so they know what they ve got. they have a known quantity in arbitration. why wouldn t it would actually be malpractice for them not to compel it at this point because they know the arbitrator assigned is going to do something. keep in mind the arbitration conversation really is about this agreement whereas i think her lawyer is making this a much bigger conversation. it s not just this question of was it signed by the president? it s also the question of has maco michael cohen said things that nullify the agreement. i think he s right too, and anderson knows this, i think. but my guess is there is documentary evidence that they don t want out. otherwise, they would not be fighting this. that s part. agreement too, right? yeah. the president attached himself onto this case when it switched to federal court. why would he do that if, according to michael cohen, this has nothing to do with the president? there s a new lawyer. the new lawyer is
bigotry seems emboldened. our politics seems more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and out right fabrication. so president bush had to have known, david gergen, what an impact his words would have. what do you think his motivations were for speaking out now? well, he had a conference that had been long scheduled, that s clear, but i also think what we saw today was two men who have held the presidency are deeply worried about the directions in which their success or is taking the country, and they re speaking conscious to power in effect. they re trying to say president trump, please don t take us down this path of division which is so deeply bothering obama and george w. bush s case, a fellow republican after all, even though there have been family tensions with his brother jeb facing a lot of nasty attacks by trump and the bush family being pretty angry about what happened in 2016.