So why cant people just you know make their all conclusions and go all further thats absolute in nature oh. And the problem with the conspiracy Conspiracy Theory is spread by the Mainstream Media is that theyre not based in reality at all theyre based on ideology for example. You know Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction he was a maniac who wanted to destroy the world that was a huge Conspiracy Theory but no one shuts down New York Times twitter accounts no one says you i to us how many times did New York Times report that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and so for hours and sometimes the thousands of women they got those say its not a Conspiracy Theory and mr trump is a liar you should be labeled and then you advance would continue business as usual right i go only to find peace leg up youll surprises only. Promotions and they and they were just keep up the ladder for a spreading their false narratives here you know this is the limit george i mean. In this is
A conspiracy theorist but over the last few years and particularly i have in mind russia gate ukraine gate even go further with saddam and weapons of mass destruction being the theres plenty of official conspiracy theories that have been thoroughly debunked but a many of the conspiracy theories that i consider conspiracy theories in the official discourse are theres no even attempt to acknowledge that they can be debunked. Oh well you are absolutely right 2 because look just started from. Facebook. Even to you to be shut down hundreds of thousands on a cost of people connected to what these companies declared to be conspiracy theories organizations you know i wont name them not to you and to them but. Everyone knows these names you know the Mainstream Media reports about them every day and if you look at the theories for which these groups were paralyzed are biased basically every one of them has some. Kind of shared though in reality i like ok its a Conspiracy Theory that the western
Judge barretts actual credentials or qualifications has hardly featured and it. Democratic leader summarized his view yesterday, he said it is not about qualifications. His words. Instead, our mechanic colleagues have tried to claim the senate process itself is not legitimate. Are supposed to lay radicalrk for institution wrecking changes down the road. But of course they are not true. We live in a constitutional republic. The legitimacy of an outcome does not depend on the feelings it provokes and politicians. Let me say that again. The legitimacy of an outcome does not depend on the feelings it provokes in politicians. Precedentscomes from , rules and ultimately the constitution. Restate a few facts for posterity. There is no inconsistency between the republican senates decision in 2016 and our decision to confirm judge barrett this year. Here is what i said in my very first floor speeches following scalia,h of justice quoting myself. The senate has not filled a vacancy arising in an
Is a political analyst and editor and host me internet media project our gentlemen crossed up rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate it i want to be me here in moscow as i said in my introduction if you disagree with the official narrative somehow youre a conspiracy theorist but over the last few years and particularly i have in mind russia gate ukraine gate even go further with saddam and weapons of mass destruction being the theres plenty of official conspiracy theories that have been thoroughly debunked but a many of the conspiracy theories that i consider conspiracy theories in the official discourse are theres no even attempt to acknowledge that they can be debunked. Oh well you are absolutely right because look just started from. Facebook. Even due to the shutdown. Hundreds of thousands of accounts of people connected to what these companies declared to be conspiracy theories organizations you know i wont name them not to give advertis
Which is some kind of a rudimentary indicator of the character of our political system and its volatility. Scarcely more than one third of our chief executives, beginning in the 18th century, have been elected to a second term for one reason or another. Eight have died in office. Four have been assassinated. Five have been elected without popular majorities. Three have been impeached, two of those in the lifetime of many people with us here today. Of all of those numbers, the one i want to emphasize the most is simply the number one. By that i mean that the president is simply one of the 536 elected officials in washington, d. C. Strictly speaking, it is 537, 535 members of congress, and im treating the president and Vice President for this purpose as a single political entity. So the president is one of 536 elected officials. When i reflect on that asymmetry between the one president and 535 other federal elected officials, im reminded of a quip by the journalist theodore white, who w