the video shows frantic and frustrated parents demanding they be let into the school. police keeping the distraught family members behind a perimeter as the shooting unfolds inside. it s still unclear when in the whole event cycle this video was shot. sandra: texas officials have yet to deliver a clear timeline of what exactly happened and when. we do know the gunman got into that school through an unlocked entrance, responding officers were met by heavy gunfire and the suspect barricaded himself inside the classroom with children and teachers. a community the victims, today would have been the last day of class before the summer break. john: texas republican congressman tony gonzalez represents uvalde, he joins us in moments. fox team coverage. alexis mcadams has more on the victims. sandra: to bill with the latest on the ground in texas, what do we know? bill: sandra, a short time ago i was in touch with a source close to the investigation and told they are in fact
Why, next was the fbi involved in this . The agency has 35,000 employees. Its got unmatched resources and expertise. Its the fbi. Why would it even consider going to a private investigator to do research on a President Elect . Keep in mind, this is not the first time the fbi has outsourced a major investigation. Recall that federal agents never examined the dnc servers after they were supposedly hacked by an outside party during the campaign. Instead, the fbi relied on the work of a dnc contractor this assured them that russia was behind the hacking. Why would the fbi do that . Did anyone at the Justice Department consider that hiring third party actors with unclear motives to conduct a highprofile investigation might be an Excellent Way for say foreign intelligence operations to sow chaos and promote their agendas . At the least without claims be colored by their natural desire
lot of this stuff and actually pay, use the taxpayers money to pay this british subject for this wacky repor
rangers as they are the lead on this investigation. i would not be surprised if you have federal law enforcement there, atf, fbi, as they are basically in a unified command investigating all together, different investigatory apparatus all together but predominantly expecting this will be a texas law enforcement, texas authority press conference to clear up some questions, some of the narrative and the timeline discrepancies that have been going around. sandra: all right. down the street from you, its on the screen next to you. so, we are watching for those officials to begin the update any moment now. a lot of outstanding questions we hope some answers come soon. john: bring in bill daly, a former fbi investigator, and bring on the screen some pictures from tuesday as frantic parents desperate to try to save their children were confronting police officers who had established and protecting a perimeter. they were imploring the police
that has provided lethal aid to ukraine. the previous administration sent blankets to ukraine. yes. there was a delay. there s nothing new in the emails about the timing. there was a lot of emails and back and forth exchanges about the timing. an interesting interview from meet the press. joining me now shawna thomas. what are the biggest take aways from the emails and what do you make of the timeline discrepancies? i think the biggest take away is it does sort of bolster senator schumer s case for actually calling witnesses once the impeachment articles get to the senate. we have more confusion. calling witnesses like doctor duffy who the witnesses are a part of. that s number one. number two, i think we need to give the senator for public integrity credit for continuing to dig into things and continuing to file foyer requests and continuing to try to make the public record about this more fulsome.
there s no other convenient explanation. that explains the timeline discrepancies. i think this limited and controlled access to jesus campos and a reason why the parent company may not have had a problem with him leaving the country for a couple days. tucker: they may have facilitated it. it wouldn t shock me at all. doesn t explain the behavior of the clark county sheriff. our producer called over there today to ask a simple question about licensing. this guy doesn t have a license as a security guard. what are the rules? they were so defensive. they yelled at him and hung up. spokesmen don t act that way when they re asked a simple question. what is that about? especially from a major media outlet. tucker, we have to remember we respect law enforcement. but this was a crime perpetrated on the american people. people are justifiably concerned why it happened and we have no answers.