thank you for being here, everyone. i m kate bolduan. president biden is wrapping up his momentous trip overseas to mark the one-year invasion of ukraine. he is meet welcome the bucharest nine in warsaw. the president declaring his unwavering support for the alliance. commitment of the united states and nato, and i ve said it to you many times and i ll say it again is absolutely clear. article 5 is a sacred commitment the united states has made. we will defend literally every inch of nato, every inch of nato. that meeting is one day after president biden accused russia of committing crimes against humanity when he was in ukraine. vladimir putin is having his own series of meetings with china s top diplomat around the time that president biden was in ukraine, russia tried to test a ballistic missile and let s begin with phil mattingly once again in warsaw. what s to come of biden s meetings today. it s interesting. this is not the dramatic symbolism of the monday surpris
heads to iowa today which is the first republican presidential caucus state. his visit comes as he is seen as eyeing a white house bid and then there s candidate donald trump. he s headed to east palestine, ohio right now, as miguel marq marquez told us, and jeff is joining us now. what do you think we ll hear from tim scott? it s been so interesting watching tim scott who just won re-election last fall and he delivers a different message that we heard from this era from the republican party. he delivers a hopeful message and an optimistic message and he shapes it in his own biography how he rose through the ranks into becoming a wealthy businessman and then becoming a u.s. senator. he really embodies what ronald reagan used to call morning in america, a hopeful and optimistic message in america and the party opened for that type of a message at this point.
anti-terrorism statute, but it is clear the justices here are still confronting this big, consequential decision of whether in both cases to refine the rules that currently govern the internet and to allow more people to sue over the content that s posted on the part of users on various social media sites. the key here, kate, is this case is a lot more broad, whether or not people can sue under this anti-terrorism statute. a lot of court watchers are saying if the court decides no that they can t sue under this anti-terrorism statute, that would alleviate the court from even deciding that question yesterday over whether section 230 fully protects social media companies and it is a technical case today and obviously big implications for big tech down the line. kate? especially as you so perfectly put it together. thank you, jess. now to growing speculation about the potential growing presidential field in 2024. republican senator tim scott